My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2025-16
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
PC-2025-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2025 10:30:44 AM
Creation date
12/23/2025 10:28:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hana Japan Restaurant Project <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />41 <br />May 2025 <br />Other important active faults in the region include the Greenville fault located <br />approximately 12 miles to the northeast of the site and the Hayward and San Andreas <br />faults, located approximately 6.5 and 26 miles, respectively, to the southwest. <br /> <br />During a major seismic event that causes ground rupture on a primary fault zone (such as <br />the Calaveras fault), secondary ground deformations can occur in the region adjacent to <br />the primary fault zone. For example, based on previous mapping reviewed by the Fault <br />Exploration, a fault may exist to the southwest of the on-site trenching, beneath or to the <br />southwest of the existing driveway. Therefore, the Fault Exploration report concluded that <br />the potential for fault rupture in the area is high and recommended all structures intended <br />for human occupancy be set back at least 25 feet from the existing driveway. <br /> <br />As shown on Figure 8, although the building configuration has changed since preparation <br />of the report, the proposed building location remains in conformance with the setback <br />recommendations within the Fault Exploration report. In addition, the Fault Exploration <br />included three exploratory trenches on the west side of the main trace. While the extent <br />and magnitude of secondary ground deformations are difficult to estimate, most secondary <br />deformations occur on shear zones or other faults located near the primary fault zone. <br />Secondary faults or zones of fault related to shearing were not encountered during the <br />trenching; therefore, the Fault Exploration report concluded that the potential for such <br />ground deformations to occur at the proposed building is low. If secondary ground <br />deformation did occur, the Fault Exploration concluded that such deformations would be <br />small, less than four inches, and could be mitigated with appropriate foundation design <br />and construction. <br /> <br />The CBSC provides minimum standards to ensure that the proposed structure would be <br />designed using sound engineering practices and appropriate engineering standards for <br />the seismic area in which the project site is located. Projects designed in accordance with <br />the CBSC should be able to: 1) resist minor earthquakes without damage; 2) resist <br />moderate earthquakes without structural damage, but with some non-structural damage; <br />and 3) resist major earthquakes without collapse, but with some structural, as well as non- <br />structural, damage. Although conformance with the CBSC does not guarantee that <br />substantial structural damage would not occur in the event of a maximum magnitude <br />earthquake, conformance with the CBSC can reasonably be assumed to ensure that the <br />proposed structure would be survivable, allowing occupants to safely evacuate in the <br />event of a major earthquake. <br /> <br />Conformance with the design standards is enforced through building plan review and <br />approval by the City of Pleasanton prior to the issuance of building permits. Proper <br />engineering of the proposed project would ensure that seismic-related effects would not <br />cause adverse impacts. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur related to <br />seismic rupture of a known earthquake fault or strong seismic ground shaking. <br /> <br />aiii,aiv. The proposed project’s potential effects related to liquefaction, landslides, lateral <br />spreading, subsidence/settlement, and expansive soils are discussed in detail below. <br /> <br />Liquefaction <br />Soil liquefaction results from loss of strength during cyclic loading, especially as a result <br />of cyclic loadings induced by earthquakes or ground shaking. Soils most susceptible to <br />liquefaction are clean, loose, saturated, uniformly graded fine sands.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.