CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET

foot-tall poles are clearly permanent fixtures and must adhere to all setback regulations. Granting an exception would create an unfair and unequal application of zoning laws. Summary and Recommendation In summary, the application for tennis court lighting should be denied because it: Directly violates explicit and documented assurances made to the Planning Commission and neighbors. Betrays the good faith agreement that led to the approval of the tennis court fence heights. Clearly violates the 20-foot side yard setback requirement, a fundamental zoning regulation. Allowing this proposal would reward deceptive practices and undermine the purpose of public hearings and planning regulations. The project, as now proposed, is significantly different from the one for which community and Planning Commission support was granted. The only correct course of action is to deny the installation of tennis court lighting and require the project to adhere to the previously approved plan. Summary and Recommendation In summary, the approval by the Zoning Administrator for tennis court lighting must be denied because it directly violates the project's established Development Standards, contradicts prior assurances made to the public and the Planning Commission, and violates existing setback regulations. These are not minor issues; they represent a fundamental change to the project that was not part of the original approval process. The only correct course of action is to deny the installation of tennis court lighting. Alan Shapiro 9/3/25, 1:09 PM Mail - Diego Mora - Outlook https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADU4YzE1MDI1LWJjYjEtNGUwNi04MGM0LWRmNjhlM2QzYmMzYwAQAPLl4o%2BMs0hfmQj4Xwo…2/2Page 125 of 323