Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 14 <br />Item #10 <br /> CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> <br />November 18, 2025 <br />Public Works - Utilities Division <br /> <br />TITLE: RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE OUTCOME OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT <br />AND FACILITY FEASIBILITY AND COST ANALYSIS, AND DIRECT STAFF TO <br />MEET AND CONFER WITH PLEASANTON GARBAGE SERVICE TO <br />NEGOTIATE A THREE TO FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE CURRENT <br />FRANCHISE AGREEMENT FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN <br />PLEASANTON AND BRING A RECOMMENDATION BACK TO CITY COUNCIL <br />NO LATER THAN JULY 2026 <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br />The City of Pleasanton (City) has issued an exclusive franchise service agreement with <br />Pleasanton Garbage Service (PGS) for waste, recycling, and organic materials collection, <br />effective July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2029. As the agreement nears expiration, the City has <br />been evaluating service options to inform the decision to issue a competitive Request for <br />Proposals (RFP) or negotiate a sole-source agreement with PGS. This report provides relevant <br />information on community and stakeholder input, facility feasibility and cost analysis, and <br />consideration of different approaches and models in other California cities. <br /> <br />While much of the analysis and public input supports a recommendation for a competitive RFP <br />to consider all available options, certain specific issues related to the transfer station and the <br />ability to maintain that operation for public use indicate the value of additional short-term sole- <br />source negotiations with PGS. During this additional negotiation period, the City and PGS will <br />meet and confer for up to six months to determine whether and how the transfer station can <br />mitigate current and likely future issues related to permit compliance, operational adjustments <br />resulting from less available space, and neighbor concerns over noise, odor, and traffic at the <br />site. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the extension negotiations with PGS focus on a short-term three-year <br />extension, with two one-year options, for a maximum extension period of five-years. This <br />extension will allow the City to ensure this critical service worth approximately $500 million for <br />the full scope of the franchise agreement, is cost-effective, high quality, and delivers the best <br />possible value to ratepayers. <br /> <br />PGS has represented, and staff agrees, that these negotiations should be resolved within six <br />months. As such, staff proposes to return to the City Council no later than July 2026 to present <br />the outcome of the discussion and a recommendation for next steps. At that time, if <br />negotiations with PGS have been successful, staff will bring back an amendment to extend the <br />current agreement and a framework within that amendment for arranging for transfer station <br />services separate from collection services in the future. If negotiations with PGS have not been <br />successful, staff intends to recommend proceeding with a competitive RFP for these services <br />to preserve sufficient time for an RFP and service provider transition before the expiration of <br />the current agreement. <br />Page 73 of 399