Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 of 8 <br />would result in rescinding City Council Resolution 91-132 and revising PMC Section 18.12.040 <br />(additional noticing procedures exist in other PMC Sections, including those listed and described <br />below under “Other Amendments”). <br /> <br />Staff suggests amending the noticing chapter to include and amend the following: <br />• Public Hearings: For projects with public hearings, staff recommends that the public <br />notice requirements align with the Government Code, which decreases the notice radius <br />from 1,000 feet to 300 feet. Additionally, publication in a newspaper or posting in three <br />public places within the City is required, as consistent with the Government Code. <br /> <br />• On-Site Project Notification: Codify the City’s administrative policy requiring on-site <br />project notification for larger applications that are subject to a public hearing before the <br />PC or City Council, projects that add one or more dwelling units (excluding ADUs), or <br />other projects at the determination of the ZA. (Note, this notification, in the form of large- <br />format signs of notices, is separate, and may be additional to, the “posting” outlined in the <br />above bullet) <br /> <br />• Mailed Project Notification: For projects requiring project notification (e.g., single-family <br />residential Design Review projects, Minor Conditional Use Permits, etc.), staff <br />recommends increasing the noticing radius from “…the surrounding property owners…as <br />determined by the Zoning Administrator” to 300-feet, aligning with the requirements for <br />public hearings. <br /> <br />While generally aligning with the Government Code, the proposed PMC amendments will <br />continue to exceed the requirements and provide broader public notification in three ways: 1) <br />Continue notifications to both property owners and tenants, where the Government Code only <br />requires property owner notification; 2) Continue on-site project notification for certain projects <br />(Bullet 2, above), which has proven effective and relatively easy to implement; and 3) Continue <br />mailing notification cards to specific project types that have no associated public hearing. <br /> <br />Appeal Amendments: Chapter 18.144 <br />Staff recommends comprehensively amending PMC Chapter 18.144 to provide amended appeal <br />procedures. The proposed amendments include clarifying appeal procedures and modifying the <br />appeal period. Staff recommends that all projects under PMC Title 18 be subject to a 10-day <br />appeal period (versus the City’s existing 15-day+ appeal period), with project approvals <br />becoming effective on the 11th day. This recommendation will align with those of most <br />neighboring jurisdictions and shorten project approval timelines. <br /> <br />As previously stated, the current appeal period is a minimum of 15 days, but it may last over 30 <br />days due to requirements of PMC Section 18.144.010 (B), which delays the end of the appeal <br />period until ZA and PC actions can be reported to the City Council at its next regular meeting. <br />Instead, rather than a City Council agenda report item of ZA and PC actions, staff proposes that <br />a weekly approval memo be posted to the City’s website for projects approved by both the <br />Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission. The intent of the approval memo is to publicize <br />all appealable discretionary planning approvals within the appeal period. City Council members <br />and Planning Commissioners will be notified of the memo publication via email, and members of <br />the public can subscribe to receive the memo to stay informed about appealable discretionary <br />Page 135 of 200