Laserfiche WebLink
P24-0420 and P24-0421, 3595 Utah Street Planning Commission <br />10 of 13 <br />subject site with a new commercial use; and (2) introduce a new commercial use into the <br />project area where other similar commercial uses operate. <br /> <br />Sustainability <br /> <br />Program 2.2: Encourage the reuse of vacant and underutilized parcels and buildings <br />within existing urban areas. <br /> <br />Industrial, Commercial and Office <br /> <br />Policy 13: Ensure that neighborhood, community, and regional commercial centers <br />provide goods and services needed by residents and businesses of <br />Pleasanton and its market area. <br /> <br />Land Use and Zoning <br />As described, the subject site generally follows the uses of the PMC’s C-S District, although <br />the PUD permits a more expansive range of uses than “straight-zoned” C-S properties. The <br />PMC permits microbreweries in the C-S by right, and a PUD Modification was recently <br />approved (PUD-81-25-12M) for the subject site to permit brew pubs, subject to the approval of <br />a CUP. The brew pub is considered an ancillary use to the microbrewery and would allow <br />patrons to consume alcohol on-site, while also patronizing on-site food trucks and the active <br />outdoor spaces around the subject site. Therefore, if the CUP were granted, the proposed <br />brew pub would be consistent with the applicable land use regulations. <br /> <br />One of the primary concerns in reviewing a CUP application is the effect of a proposed use on <br />surrounding uses. The proposed use would be located in an area comprising a variety of <br />commercial, office, and light industrial uses. The adjacent sites and buildings consist of similar <br />uses. The closest residential uses are approximately 850 and 1,300 feet away to the west and <br />east, respectively; thus, any noise impacts would be negligible. (Also see discussion below <br />regarding noise impacts). Therefore, if the CUP were granted, the proposed use would be <br />compatible with the surrounding uses. <br /> <br />Should future problems arise with the proposed use, the City would have the ability to bring the <br />application back to the Planning Commission to specify additional mitigation, or possible permit <br />revocation, if necessary. Based on the discussion above, staff believes such an action would <br />be unlikely as other drive-through restaurant uses are operating within the same Valley Plaza <br />Shopping Center, as well as previously on the subject site, with no issues reported to the City. <br />In addition, staff has included conditions of approval that will ensure the proposed use would <br />not generate noise, traffic, or parking shortages such that surrounding uses would be <br />adversely affected. Therefore, if the CUP were granted, staff believes the use would be <br />compatible with the surrounding uses, and from a land use perspective, finds the proposed use <br />to be acceptable on the subject site. <br /> <br />Development Standards, Site Plan, Traffic, Circulation, and Parking <br />While not prescribed by the PUD (either for existing or new development), the project fully <br />conforms to the development standards of the C-S District for setbacks, height, and Floor Area <br />Ratio (FAR). <br />