My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />and 2 (Stoneridge Mall) are located west of I-680 between the highway and <br />the Pleasanton Ridgelands; therefore, development on Sites 1 (Lester) and 2 <br />(Stoneridge Shopping Center, Mall) that is consistent with the Housing <br />Element Update could partially obstruct views of this scenic resource. <br />Additionally, Sites 9 (Metro 580), 11 (Old Santa Rita Area), 12 (Pimlico Area), <br />and 29 (Oracle) and the Dublin-Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) <br />station property are located adjacent to I-580, and development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update would be fully visible from the highway, <br />which could damage scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway. All of <br />the sites adjacent to I-580 would be designated as high-density sites, which <br />represents an increase in intensity at each of these sites from existing <br />conditions. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that development applications <br />for subsequent development consistent with the Housing Element Update <br />would be reviewed by the City for compliance with the goals, policies, and <br />programs of the General Plan, applicable specific plans, applicable zoning <br />requirements, design guidelines, and the Scenic Highway Plan, and <br />compliance with these standards would ensure development consistent with <br />the Housing Element Update would not substantially damage scenic <br />resources within view of a State Scenic Highway and impacts would be less <br />than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The project site is located approximately 3.35 miles east of I-680, an officially <br />designated State Scenic Highway, and approximately 2.74 miles south of I- <br />580, which is eligible for designation.2 Urbanized portions of the City intervene <br />between the project site and I-680, preventing views of the designated <br />Scenic Highway. The project site was not identified by the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR as visible from I-680. Therefore, development of the proposed <br />project would not damage any scenic resources such as trees, rock <br />outcroppings, or historic buildings visible from I-680. <br />c) Consistency with Scenic Quality Regulations and Visual Character <br />Would the project: In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? <br />(Public views are those that are experienced from publicly <br />accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, <br /> <br />2 California Department of Transportation. California State Scenic Highway System Map. Available <br />at: https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html. Accessed January 2025.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.