My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />Visual Character <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that the majority of the potential <br />sites for rezoning are already developed or are partially developed with <br />urbanized uses, or are relatively small sites completely surrounded by <br />urbanized uses. Development of such sites would not conflict with or diminish <br />the existing scenic quality. However, Sites 1 (Lester), 3 (PUSD-Donlon), 14 (St. <br />Elizabeth Seton), 21a and b (Kiewit), 22 (Merritt), 26 (St. Augustine), 27 (PUSD- <br />Vineyard), 29 (Oracle), and portions of Site 24 (Sonoma Drive) are vacant. <br />Introduction of new residential uses would have the potential to alter the <br />visual character of these potential sites for housing. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that compliance with General <br />Plan policies and programs and adherence to development and design <br />standards in the Municipal Code and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan <br />and Hacienda Design Guidelines would ensure that future development <br />projects consistent with the Housing Element Update are cohesive, <br />appropriately designed in terms of potential aesthetic impacts, and reflect <br />the character of the City. At the programmatic level, aesthetic impacts to <br />the quality of public views in non-urbanized areas would be less than <br />significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />As noted above, the project site is currently undeveloped. However, existing <br />single-family residential development is located to the east, west, and south <br />of the site. Therefore, the proposed project would be located in an urbanized <br />portion of the City, and development of single-family residences on-site <br />would be consistent with the visual character of the surrounding area. In <br />addition, the proposed project would be consistent with the City’s <br />anticipated on-site development and would comply with all applicable <br />development standards required by the City and the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan, including standards related to building height, lot <br />area, setbacks, and building design. Furthermore, as shown in Exhibit 6, the <br />proposed project would incorporate landscaping and new trees throughout <br />the project site, thereby complying with City standards related to such. The <br />proposed project would also be subject to a Design Review by the City, <br />which would allow the review of all proposed development, signs, buildings, <br />structures, and other facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would not <br />result in any new or peculiar impacts related to conflicting with applicable <br />zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.