My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />82 <br /> <br />borings up to a depth of eight feet below ground surface (bgs). According to <br />the Geotechnical Investigation Report, materials encountered in the borings <br />were predominantly dark brown, moist, stiff sandy clay with trace subangular <br />gravel to an approximate depth of four to five feet. Below four to five feet <br />bgs, the material generally remained sandy clay but the material became <br />very stiff and dark to medium brown in color. In addition, the project site is <br />relatively flat with a gradual slope. The peak elevation of 428 feet occurs <br />near the intersection of Manoir Lane and Old Vineyard Avenue. The low <br />point occurs near the intersection of Thiessen Street and Vineyard Avenue <br />with an elevation of 392 feet. Grades from the east and west fall towards the <br />center of the site creating a valley. Finally, the Geotechnical Investigation <br />Report notes the presence of some undocumented fill along the northern <br />project site boundary, likely the result of grading activities along Vineyard <br />Avenue. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings <br />and is estimated at depths of 25 to 30 feet bgs. The Geotechnical <br />Investigation Report did not note the presence of either septic tanks or <br />paleontological resources on-site. <br />a) Earthquakes <br />Would the project: Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: (i) Rupture of a <br />known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- <br />Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist <br />for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known <br />fault; (ii) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking; (iii) Seismic-related ground <br />failure, including liquefaction; or (iv) Landslides. <br />i and ii) Surface Fault Rupture and Strong Seismic Ground Shaking <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that the Calaveras Fault and its <br />associated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone intersects the city limits along <br />its western boundary. Because portions of Site 22 (Merritt) are underlain by <br />this Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and Site 2 (Stoneridge Shopping <br />Center, Mall) is just to the east of the fault zone, there is a risk of ground <br />rupture at these sites. Various other sites are within 1 mile of the Pleasanton <br />and Verona Faults and their respective Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zones. Refer <br />to Draft EIR Exhibit 3.6-2. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that compliance with California <br />Building Standards Code (CBSC), applicable Municipal Code requirements, <br />as well as goals, policies, and programs included as part of the General Plan,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.