My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />124 <br /> <br />Update contains a multitude of policies and actions to require and ensure <br />community connectivity as buildout occurs. <br />Therefore, the Housing Element Update FEIR concluded the Housing Element <br />Update does not propose any changes to the roadway circulation network <br />such that new or expanded roadways are contemplated. For these reasons, <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />As discussed above, a project risks dividing an established community if the <br />project would introduce infrastructure or alter land use so as to change the <br />land use conditions in the surrounding community or isolate an existing land <br />use. The proposed project would include the development of 27 single-family <br />residences and 27 ADUs, which would be consistent with the type of <br />development anticipated for the project site by the City, as well as with the <br />existing development surrounding the project site. Therefore, the proposed <br />project would represent a continuation of the surrounding development and <br />would not isolate an existing land use. Overall, impacts related to physically <br />dividing an established community were adequately addressed in the <br />Housing Element Update FEIR, and the proposed project would not result in <br />any peculiar effects that would require further CEQA review related to such. <br />b) Conflict with Applicable Land Use Plans, Policies, or Regulations <br />Would the project: Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with <br />any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of <br />avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />Plan Bay Area 2050-Sustainable Communities Strategy/Regional Transportation Plan <br />Consistency <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that, consistent with Plan Bay <br />Area 2050, the Housing Element Update includes several policies and <br />programs intended to improve the quality of the housing inventory, conserve <br />existing neighborhoods, increase housing affordability, and remove potential <br />governmental and non-governmental constraints to housing for lower‐ <br />income households and persons with special needs. Individual development <br />projects would also be subject to relevant Housing Element Policies and <br />Municipal Code requirements regarding growth management to ensure that <br />residential development is consistent with the City’s infrastructure capacity.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.