My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
07-09
>
Planning Commission meeting agenda packet 7-9-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 3:39:07 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 3:30:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1025
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Vineyard Avenue Residential Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The majority of the City is classified as Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs) with no <br />significant mineral deposits (MRZ-1). Southeastern areas of Pleasanton, as well <br />as areas west of I-680, are classified as areas containing mineral deposits, the <br />significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data (MRZ-3). <br />Given that the project site is not located in the vicinity of the MRZs identified <br />by the City, mineral resources are not located on-site. In addition, the <br />Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared for the proposed project (see <br />Appendix E) does not indicate that mineral resources are present on-site. <br />Thus, the proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects to mineral <br />resources such that further CEQA review for this topic would be required. <br />Conclusion <br />With regards to Mineral Resources, the consistency checklist demonstrates <br />that: <br />1. No peculiar impacts related to the proposed project or its site have <br />been identified. <br />2. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts <br />which were not discussed by the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an <br />impact which is more severe than anticipated by the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR. <br />4. No mitigation measures would be required because the proposed <br />project’s specific impacts would be less than significant. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />None.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.