Laserfiche WebLink
Amendment to Tract 8724, 0 Vineyard Avenue Planning Commission <br />Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />emergency access easement. The design of the subdivision and related improvements <br />does not conflict with the proposed easements. <br /> <br />8. The restriction on approving a tentative subdivision map on land covered by a land <br />conservation contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act <br />of 1965 (Williamson Act) is not applicable. <br /> <br />The site is not covered by a land conservation contract, including a Williamson Act contract. <br /> <br />9. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision would not result in violation <br />of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board (RWQCB). <br /> <br />No discharge violation currently exists, and sewer capacity is available for this subdivision. <br />The project would not discharge any waste other than domestic sewage, and all sewage <br />would be discharged into the city’s sanitary sewer system for ultimate treatment. <br />Stormwater runoff would be collected and conveyed through bio-retention basins located <br />on the north and west sides of the parcel. Urban stormwater runoff is required to meet the <br />City’s RWQCB permit requirements for urban development. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, (Public Resources Code <br />[PRC] § 21000, et seq.), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and a Mitigation Monitoring <br />and Reporting Program (MMRP), was prepared and certified by the City of Pleasanton (City) <br />on January 26, 2023 (City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />Program Final Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2022040091). <br /> <br />An amended Consistency Checklist, reflecting the split park site plan, was prepared pursuant <br />to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning) to <br />determine whether the proposed project requires additional environmental review. The <br />Consistency Checklist is attached to this report as Exhibit C. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 <br />mandates that projects consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, <br />community plan, or general plan policies for which an FEIR was certified (in this case the <br />Housing Element Update FEIR) shall not require additional environmental review, except as <br />might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects peculiar to <br />the project or its site. <br /> <br />Section 15183 specifies that examination of environmental effects shall be limited to those <br />effects that: (1) are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located, <br />and were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan, <br />or community plan, with which the project is consistent, (2) are potentially significant off -site <br />impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the <br />zoning action, general plan, or community plan, or (3) are previously identified significant <br />effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the <br />EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the <br />prior EIR. Section 15183(c) further specifies that if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to