Laserfiche WebLink
P25-0236, 2207 Martin Avenue. Planning Commission <br />4 of 6 <br />Zoning <br />The subject property is zoned PUD-LDR and is subject to the R-1-40,000 District development <br />standards, as well as more site-specific development standards incorporated into the <br />Conditions of Approval adopted as part of PUD-148. <br /> <br />Tennis Court Development Standards <br />The PMC does not address sports courts and associated lighting. However, the approval for <br />PUD-148 includes specific tennis court development standards, which include the following: <br /> <br />a. Allow fencing at a maximum height of 10 feet in height at the front and rear (narrow) <br />ends of the tennis court. <br />b. Allow fencing at a maximum height of 8 feet on the long sides of the tennis court, <br />extending from the 10-foot-high corner poles to the service lines. <br />c. Vining vegetation shall be planted to grow along the tennis court fencing, and tall, <br />5-gallon minimum vegetation shall be placed between the tennis court and northern <br />property line fencing. <br />d. The Applicant and neighbor (appellant) shall share repair costs of an approximately <br />7-foot-high solid wood fence along the northern property line between 2207 Martin <br />Avenue and 3520 Dennis Drive. If the applicant and neighbor have not shared costs to <br />pay for the repairs within six months of the effective date of this approval, the applicant <br />shall be relieved of this condition. <br />e. Tennis court lighting above 8 feet in height shall require Administrative Design Review. <br /> <br />Since the approval of PUD-148, the applicant has added vegetation on the northern <br />property/fence line and increased the height of the existing wood fence at the rear (along <br />Dennis Drive) from approximately 6 feet to 7 feet pursuant to an approved over-height-fence <br />permit (Case No. P24-0196). The applicant has also completed construction of the step-down <br />style tennis court fencing with vegetation as required by item c above (Exhibit B). Furthermore, <br />the applicant is no longer subject to item d above due to the lapse of time. <br /> <br />The applicant proposes tennis court lighting consistent with, or below, industry standards for <br />recreational tennis courts (see May 22, 2024, agenda report for industry standard analysis). <br />Exhibit B includes a photometric study evaluating six anti-glare, approximately 15-foot-tall light <br />poles with approximately 18-inch extension arms, three of which–on the north side–are <br />equipped with shields. The lighting/photometric study also provides nighttime and footcandle <br />color renderings illustrating the lighting impacts. Both renderings show the light focused <br />downward toward the court with no spillover beyond the property boundaries. <br /> <br />According to the lighting/photometric study (Exhibit B), the proposed lighting, with the included <br />mitigation measures, would result in zero light spillover to the adjacent north property or to <br />Dennis Drive across the rear property line. In addition, existing vegetation provides further light <br />mitigation. As part of the original tennis court and fencing approvals under PUD-148, a mix of <br />plantings was installed and has since matured to a height of approximately 6 to 9 feet (Exhibit <br />B). <br /> <br />The application also provides existing lighting conditions adjacent to/near the project site, <br />including streetlights on Dennis Drive and garage lights from the adjacent property to the north <br />at 3520 Dennis Drive. Staff believes the proposed tennis court lighting would not significantly <br />increase the overall lighting in the surrounding area. As part of the ADR approval, the lights are