Planning Commission Agenda Packet 102225 (1)

EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. PC-2025-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT THE VINEYARD AVENUE CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF GATES ON PRIVATE DRIVES AT THE DISCRETION OF THE COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR THEIR DESIGNEE. (P25-0294) WHEREAS, on June 1, 1999, with the adoption of Ordinance 1782, the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (VACSP) was established; and WHEREAS, on August 28, 2025, Tony and Linda Brunetti on behalf of Winding Oaks Drive residents (“Applicant”) submitted an application to amend the VACSP to allow the installation of gates on private drives at the discretion of the Community and Economic Development Director or their designee; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered relevant exhibits, recommendations of the City staff concerning this application, and received testimony from the applicant and interested parties; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, that prior to taking action of the Project, and at a properly noticed public meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed oral staff reports, took testimony and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively the “Record Evidence”). The Planning Commission’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this resolution by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton: Section 1: The Planning Commission finds that the project is within the scope of the VASCP Environmental Impact Report (EIR). No additional environmental review is required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15162 because no substantial changes to the PUD are proposed, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, and no new information of substantial importance shows that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR. Section 2: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendments to the VACSP are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan . Section 3: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Case No. P25-0294, application to amend the VASCP to allow the installation of gates on private drives