My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 2-3-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
020326 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 2-3-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2026 10:24:56 AM
Creation date
1/30/2026 10:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/3/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
AGENDA PACKET
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton’s Position: Regional Comparison <br />City Rate Updated Notes <br />Alameda 14%2023 <br />Hayward 14%Aug. 2025 72% Approval <br />Newark 14%Jan. 2025 80% Approval <br />Oakland 14%2009 <br />San Leandro 14%2016 <br />Union City 13.86%2024 Annual adjustments <br />Berkeley 12%*1991 *Plus 3% TID <br />Emeryville 12%2002 <br />Albany 10%1958 <br />Fremont 10%2009 <br />Dublin 8%1982 <br />Livermore 8%1983 <br />Pleasanton 8%1983 <br />Key Takeaways <br />•5 of 13 cities at 14% <br />•10 of 13 cities at 10% or higher <br />•Tri-Valley has lowest rates in <br />county <br />•Pleasanton rate unchanged <br />since 1983 <br />•Recent increases: Newark <br />(Jan. 2025), Hayward (Aug. <br />2025) – both passed with <br />strong margins <br />What We Heard <br />•No opposition to a rate increase <br />•Feedback ranged from neutral to supportive <br />•Market capacity exists for 12% <br />•Operators confirmed Pleasanton rate is well below comparables <br />•Preference for phased implementation <br />•Incremental changes preferred over single large adjustment <br />•Limited active engagement expected <br />•Operators would not actively campaign for or against <br />•Visit Try-Valley <br />•Understands City’s financial situation; interested in additional funding <br />Page 70 of 80
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.