My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 2-3-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
020326 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 2-3-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2026 10:24:56 AM
Creation date
1/30/2026 10:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/3/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
AGENDA PACKET
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 4 <br />This report proposes the City Council adopt a policy framework for consideration of such <br />requests, based on the potential merits of proactively considering potential re-zones. Staff's <br />recommendation is to create a structured process that would allow for periodic early <br />consideration of whether potential re-zone projects should be allowed to move forward to <br />submit a formal development application. <br /> <br />Past Approaches <br />In the last ten years or so, re-zone requests have generally been considered on a relatively <br />limited basis: either through collective re-zoning of several properties as part of a plan update, <br />or outside of these updates through the Council-adopted two-year work plan. <br /> <br />In recent years, the 8-year Housing Element cycle has been the primary vehicle for <br />consideration of residential re-zoning, based on the State’s requirements to identify and zone <br />for housing to meet the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). In the most recent <br />Housing Element process, 19 sites were identified and re-zoned through an evaluation process <br />that considered conformity to Housing Element law (sites selection criteria, densities suitable <br />to contribute to the lower- and moderate-income inventory), as well as location (e.g. transit <br />proximity, clustering/distributions), neighborhood compatibility, and other factors. The creation <br />of the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone (JDEDZ) was the most recent example of a <br />large-scale commercial re-zoning effort. <br /> <br />Outside these types of broader rezonings, past City Councils relied on the two-year work plan <br />process to receive and consider requests to rezone property. No clear criteria were established <br />to evaluate such requests, although factors such as project type, density and location, staff <br />workload, and developer presentations on the benefits or qualities of specific projects were <br />discussed during the work plan process. <br /> <br />The most recent work plan process was revised to take a more systematic approach, focusing <br />on the implementation of the 5-Year Strategic Plan and related City Council-identified priorities. <br />In addition to advancing key policy goals of the City Council (e.g. Economic Development, <br />financial sustainability), the work plan reflects the constraints of limited staff and financial <br />resources by prioritizing the most important efforts, alongside items that must be completed <br />based on regulatory requirements, past or ongoing project investments, or because they are <br />urgent or time-sensitive. Only one site-specific re-zone, for the Zaheri (auto-mall) property was <br />included in the project prioritization, as a "Tier 1" - Active Priority. <br /> <br />Regulatory Context <br />Several recent state laws have limited the scope and degree of discretion given to local <br />jurisdictions, particularly when reviewing residential projects located on sites already zoned for <br />housing, and generally limiting such review to confirming conformance with objective <br />development standards. Once zoned, projects have the ability to use State Density Bonus <br />Law to request concessions and waivers of those standards when found to be a constraint to <br />development at zoned densities. In general, commercial projects are subject to far fewer <br />legislative constraints, and the City can exercise greater discretion at various approval steps, <br />whether through a commercial rezoning or requirements to process a subsequent Conditional <br />Use Permit, although such conditions or requirements need to be reasonable and tied to <br />identified project impacts. <br /> <br />A proactive decision to offer discretionary rezoning, whether for a commercial or residential <br />Page 74 of 80
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.