My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
NHA ADVISORS, LLC
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
CONTRACTS
>
N
>
NHA ADVISORS, LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2026 3:30:37 PM
Creation date
3/4/2026 3:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CONTRACTS
Description Type
Professional Services
Contract Type
New
NAME
NHA ADVISORS, LLC
Contract Record Series
704-05
Munis Contract #
2026443
Contract Expiration
6/30/2026
NOTES
CONSULTANT PROVIDING PENSION STRATEGIES.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1/15/2026 <br />4 <br />RiversideCA.gov <br />19 <br />NEAR TERM SAVINGS RANGE <br />Estimated Savings Dependent on Size of Restructuring <br />•$5M to $9M in average annual <br />savings for first 15 years <br />•$10M to $14M in <br />average annual savings <br />for first 15 years <br />•$15M to $20M+ in <br />average annual <br />savings for first 15 <br />years <br />Small <br />$150M - $200M <br />(25-30% of UAL) <br />Medium <br />$250M - $375M <br />(40-60% of UAL) <br />Large <br />$400M - $600M <br />(60-95% of UAL) <br />RiversideCA.gov <br />20 <br />UAL RESTRUCTURING – SIZING CONCEPTS <br />Balancing Risk vs. Reward <br />Less UAL Taken Out = <br />+Lower amount of reinvestment <br />/ market timing risk BUT-Lower amount of potential <br />savings and ability to smooth <br />payments <br />More UAL Taken Out = <br />+Largest amount of potential <br />savings and payment smoothing <br />BUT-Higher re-investment / market <br />timing risk <br />Risks <br />discussed in <br />detail in <br />Section V <br />RiversideCA.gov <br />21 <br />•For ease of presentation, detailed savings analysis only <br />shown for a medium-size restructure <br />–Many other alternatives would be evaluated during <br />proposed due diligence process <br />•$300M size chosen to balance risk/reward and <br />maximize savings to General Fund <br />•Level debt service amortization assumed with first <br />three years interest only <br />BASE CASE: $300M RESTRUCTURING <br />RiversideCA.gov <br />22 <br />•Annual savings for next <br />15 years ranges up to <br />$14M; averaging about <br />$10.5M <br />–$175M total savings <br />through FY 2039 <br />•Increased annual <br />payments ranges up to <br />18M from FY 2040 to FY <br />2050 <br />–$125M total increase in <br />payments after FY 2039 <br />•Cumulative estimated <br />savings of $50M <br />–Even with longer <br />amortization and 3- <br />years interest only <br />BASE CASE: $300M MEDIUM SIZE RESTRUCTURE <br />Chart and Estimated Savings <br /> $- <br /> $5,000,000 <br /> $10,000,000 <br /> $15,000,000 <br /> $20,000,000 <br /> $25,000,000 <br /> $30,000,000 <br /> $35,000,000 <br /> $40,000,000 <br /> $45,000,000 <br /> $50,000,000 <br /> $55,000,000 <br /> $60,000,000 <br /> $65,000,000 <br />20 <br />2 <br />1 <br />20 <br />2 <br />2 <br />20 <br />2 <br />3 <br />20 <br />2 <br />4 <br />20 <br />2 <br />5 <br />20 <br />2 <br />6 <br />20 <br />2 <br />7 <br />20 <br />2 <br />8 <br />20 <br />2 <br />9 <br />20 <br />3 <br />0 <br />20 <br />3 <br />1 <br />20 <br />3 <br />2 <br />20 <br />3 <br />3 <br />20 <br />3 <br />4 <br />20 <br />3 <br />5 <br />20 <br />3 <br />6 <br />20 <br />3 <br />7 <br />20 <br />3 <br />8 <br />20 <br />3 <br />9 <br />20 <br />4 <br />0 <br />20 <br />4 <br />1 <br />20 <br />4 <br />2 <br />20 <br />4 <br />3 <br />20 <br />4 <br />4 <br />20 <br />4 <br />5 <br />20 <br />4 <br />6 <br />20 <br />4 <br />7 <br />20 <br />4 <br />8 <br />20 <br />4 <br />9 <br />20 <br />5 <br />0 <br />Orange Line <br />represents current <br />total payments <br />(before a UAL <br />restructure) <br />Est. NEW POB Interest <br />Remaining GF UAL <br />Payments to CalPERS <br />Other GF Debt <br />RiversideCA.gov <br />23 <br />1.$300M POB (≈ 47% of total City UAL) could potentially generate <br />over $10M of average annual savings for the next 15 years <br />–More near term savings could be created (at the expense of larger <br />payments in out years) and overall payment shape further smoothed <br />if principal deferral technique is used (see appendix for technical <br />details) <br />2.The City and its advisor will explore smaller and larger options and <br />various amortization shapes during recommended due diligence <br />period <br />3.Under any scenario, even a principal deferral one, it is the City’s <br />intention to ensure that projected payments after a restructuring <br />are lower than currently projected (without a restructuring) <br />TAKEAWAYS FROM BASE CASE ANALYSIS <br />IV. RECENT UAL RESTRUCTURINGS <br />BY OTHER CITIES <br />19 20 <br />21 22 <br />23 24 <br />Docusign Envelope ID: BB80A86F-2853-4F40-B02D-18F5B9DD615F
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.