My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-07
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2026 9:23:51 AM
Creation date
4/13/2026 9:23:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/25/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Policy (City of Pleasanton) page 15 / 37 <br />(E) parcels within a land use designation of agriculture; <br />(F) parcels within a land use designation of public and institutional; <br />(G) parcels that are designated as public park or parkland in the City’s Parks <br />and Recreation Master Plan; <br />(H) parcels with an existing City-owned water tank facility or parcels adjacent <br />to a City-owned water tank facility; <br />(I) parcels with an existing school; <br />(J) parcels with an existing religious institution; <br />(K) any location within the Downtown Specific Plan Area where the wireless <br />facility is stealth with concealment elements pursuant to Section 12 and is <br />an installation on a rooftop or is architecturally integrated into an existing <br />building; <br />(L) parcels that have no underlying zoning, (e.g., portions of the Iron Horse <br />Trail), and that are adjacent to any of the land use designations identified <br />above. <br />(M) [reserved] <br /> <br />(2) Discouraged Locations. When no preferred location is technically feasible <br />and potentially available, the applicant may propose a wireless facility in a <br />discouraged location pursuant to an exception under Section 15, including a <br />written justification supported by factual and verifiable evidence, demonstrating <br />that no preferred location is technically feasible and potentially available. If a <br />wireless facility must be placed in a discouraged location, the applicant shall <br />use the least-discouraged location that is technically feasible and potentially <br />available. The following locations are discouraged, and ordered from least <br />discouraged to most discouraged: <br /> <br />(A) any location where the wireless facility is not stealth with concealment <br />elements pursuant to Section 12 and is within 500 feet of an existing tower <br />or other freestanding wireless facility; <br />(B) any location where the wireless facility is not stealth with concealment <br />elements pursuant to Section 12 and is visible from the I-580 or I-680 <br />freeways, or is located within 200 feet of an historic resource; <br />(C) any location within the Downtown Specific Plan Area where the wireless <br />facility is not stealth with concealment elements pursuant to Section 12 , or <br />is an installation on a tower or other freestanding wireless facility or an <br />existing non-building structure (e.g., electric transmission tower, flagpole, <br />commercial pole sign, etc.), even if stealth with concealment elements; <br />(D) parcels with a land use designation of residential or parcels within a PUD <br />with residential land use designations or development standards <br />substantially similar to the residential land use designations; <br />(E) any location where the wireless facility would be within 100 feet from a <br />residential dwelling unit (but not accessory structures, detached garages, <br />sheds, pool houses, etc.). <br />(F) [reserved] <br /> <br />Docusign Envelope ID: 51CE5BDE-55F1-4B3D-8865-17E5814CF0C5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.