Laserfiche WebLink
REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FACILITIES PROJECT <br />FEASIBILITY STUDY <br /> <br /> 6 Zone 7 Water Agency <br />December, 2025 <br /> <br />and the broader regional dataset from existing Zone 7 and City wells, which more accurately represents <br />long-term basin conditions. <br />Zone 7 voluntarily sets water quality targets that in some instances are more stringent than state and <br />federal requirements. For example, under Zone 7’s Water Quality policies, PFAS concentrations in <br />delivered treated water is generally required to remain below 80 percent of primary and secondary <br />federal/state Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) standards and/or 80 percent below proposed and <br />enforced notification levels. Zone 7’s target water quality goals also include more stringent levels for <br />boron, salinity and hardness, taste and odor, hexavalent chromium and other specific contaminants as <br />compared to state/federal MCL standards. A full list of Zone 7 potable water quality target goals can be <br />found in Appendix D. <br />While treatment for hardness and TDS is not required at this time for state and federal regulatory <br />compliance, as part of this Study’s efforts, a Basis of Design Report and 10 percent design with probable <br />construction and operational costs will be developed to allow Zone 7 (separate from the City) to evaluate <br />the feasibility and cost of treatment of these constituents should Zone 7 choose to pursue it for regional <br />salt management purposes. <br />PFAS Assessment <br />PFAS conditions and potential future risks were evaluated using Zone 7’s basin-wide PFAS fate and <br />transport model (EKI, 2025). For modeling purposes, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) was used as a <br />representative compound for the PFAS class. The 20-year predictive model simulations indicate that PFOS <br />concentrations at all three proposed well sites remain below Zone 7’s operational water quality goals (80 <br />percent of applicable proposed or enforced notification levels or MCLs) under both the Baseline (No- <br />Project) and Project Alternative scenarios. <br />Simulated PFOS concentrations at the Tennis Park site are the highest of the three, primarily due to its <br />relative proximity to the existing PFAS footprint and high production rate, but still remain below Zone 7’s <br />target levels in all model scenarios, with final predicted concentrations ranging from approximately 0.9 to <br />1.5 parts per trillion (ppt). Modeling results and assumptions are summarized in Appendix G. <br />The conclusion of the PFAS modeling analysis is that treatment for PFAS is not required for the proposed <br />production wells to meet current regulatory or Zone 7 water quality targets. However, recognizing the <br />evolving nature of PFAS regulations and ongoing regional investigations, Zone 7 is further assessing <br />potential feasible PFAS treatment approaches from a conceptual cost and site-space perspective as part <br />of this Study with development of a Basis of Design Report and 10 percent design with probable <br />construction and operational costs. Implementation of PFAS treatment is not planned at this time and <br />would be pursued separately by Zone 7 if future regulatory or operational conditions warrant. <br />2.1.2. Groundwater Production Rates <br />Test well drilling and aquifer testing conducted at Tennis Park, Hansen Park, and Del Prado Park confirmed <br />that the Bernal Subbasin has favorable hydrogeologic conditions capable of supporting high-capacity <br />municipal supply wells. Constant-rate pumping tests were performed at each site to evaluate sustainable <br />yield, aquifer response, and long-term production potential. Zone 7’s groundwater modeling was also <br />applied to assess the potential for mutual well interference between the proposed project wells and