Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />4-95 <br /> <br /> <br />Mechanical treatments would not be applied on slopes above 50 percent. Implementation of SPRs AD-3, <br />AQ-3, and GEO-3 through GEO-5 would reduce the risk of erosion and landslides post-prescribed burn <br />and/or post-fire, in the event that a wildfire occurred as a result of the proposed treatments or an <br />unrelated occurrence. Implementation of AD-3 would ensure consistency with local plans, policies, and <br />related ordinances. Implementation of SPR AQ-3 would minimize soil burn severity during prescribed <br />burns, which would help to retain vegetation to stabilize the soil. SPR GEO-3 would require stabilization of <br />disturbed soil areas during treatment activities, SPR GEO-4 would require inspection of the treatment area <br />for proper erosion control measures prior to the rainy season and immediately following the first large <br />rainfall event, and SPR GEO-5 would require stormwater to be drained via water breaks to decrease the <br />potential for channelized erosion within linear treatment areas. As described in Impact WIL-1, this project <br />intends to create and maintain a reduced fuel zone, which may lead to smaller burn scars, or less area <br />susceptible to post-fire flooding or erosion. <br />The inclusion of approximately 93 acres of land that is outside the CalVTP treatable landscape in the <br />proposed treatment area constitutes a change to the geographic extent presented in the PEIR. However, <br />within the boundary of the project area, the post-fire landslide risk of the project area is essentially the <br />same within and outside the treatable landscape due to similar slopes, soils, and hydrological and <br />geological conditions. Therefore, the wildfire impact outside the treatable landscape is also the same and <br />less than significant, as described above, with implementation of the same SPRs. The impact outside the <br />treatable landscapes would be consistent with the lands analyzed in the PEIR. The Project would not create <br />any substantially more severe significant impacts than identified in the PEIR. <br />4.16.1.3. New Impacts to Wildfire <br />The proposed treatments are consistent with the treatment types and activities considered in the PEIR. <br />The site-specific characteristics of the proposed treatments have been considered and found to be <br />consistent with the applicable environmental and regulatory conditions presented in the CalVTP PEIR <br />(refer to Sections 3.16.1, Environmental Setting, and 3.16.2, Regulatory Setting, in Volume II of the Final <br />PEIR). The project proponent has also determined that the inclusion of land that is outside the CalVTP <br />treatable landscape in the proposed treatment area constitutes a change to the geographic extent <br />presented in the PEIR. However, within the boundary of the project area, the existing environmental and <br />regulatory conditions pertinent to wildfire that are present in the areas outside the treatable landscape <br />are essentially the same as those within the treatable landscape; therefore, the impacts of the proposed <br />treatment project are also consistent with those covered in the PEIR. No changed circumstances are <br />present, and the inclusion of areas outside of the CalVTP treatable landscape would not give rise to any <br />new significant impacts. Therefore, no new impact related to wildfire risk would occur.