My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-72 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />Pre- and during-treatment Surveys. Either treatment will avoid occupied habitat or <br />treatment will be implemented in such a way that it does not disturb Alameda whipsnake. <br />If work occurs within occupied a qualified RPF or biologist be present on-site to monitor for <br />Alameda whipsnake, flag areas for avoidance and establish no-work buffers. Implementing <br />treatment activities within suitable Alameda whipsnake habitat would require focused <br />surveys to determine presence of Alameda whipsnake each day prior to work at each new <br />area. If crews are working within suitable Alameda whipsnake habitat, a qualified RPF or <br />biologist would conduct ongoing focused pre-treatment surveys during treatment <br />activities, adhering to methodologies recommended in Miller and Alvarez (2016). Within <br />highly suitable habitat, surveys would be repeated in treatment areas immediately prior to <br />vegetation removal to ensure that the species is not present prior to the start of work in <br />each scrub area. A qualified RPF or biologist would check suitable refugia within the work <br />area including vegetation and rock piles. When dense vegetation within suitable Alameda <br />whipsnake habitat inhibits visual survey effectiveness, the biologist would work closely <br />with the crew to intermittently cut a small amount of brush to allow surveys of small <br />areas. Active surveys would be performed throughout the vegetation removal activity <br />within suitable Alameda whipsnake habitat, and if work ceases more than one hour, the <br />area would be re-surveyed prior to restarting work. During this survey effort, the qualified <br />RPF or biologist would also advise the crew on avoidance of on-site potential refugia such <br />as burrows and rock piles. <br />Prior to vegetation clearing activities within suitable Alameda whipsnake habitat, <br />coverboards would be installed in key areas as determined by a RFP or qualified biologist. <br />The coverboards would be strategically placed to provide refuge for the Alameda <br />whipsnake leaving the work area. Coverboards would be inspected at the end of each <br />workday, and wildlife using them would be recorded.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.