Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />A-85 <br /> <br /> <br />MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? <br />(Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING <br />ENTITY <br />VERIFYING/ <br />MONITORING <br />ENTITY <br />The project proponent would prepare a Compensatory Mitigation Plan that identifies the <br />residual significant effects that require compensatory mitigation and describes the <br />compensatory mitigation strategy being implemented to reduce residual effects, and: <br />1. For preserving existing habitat outside of the treatment area in perpetuity, <br />the Compensatory Mitigation Plan would include a summary of the <br />proposed compensation lands (e.g., the number and type of credits, location <br />of mitigation bank or easement), parties responsible for the long-term <br />management of the land, and the legal and funding mechanisms for long- <br />term conservation (e.g., holder of conservation easement or fee title). The <br />project proponent would submit evidence that the necessary mitigation has <br />been implemented or that the project proponent has entered into a legal <br />agreement to implement it and that compensatory habitat would be <br />preserved in perpetuity. <br />2. For restoring or enhancing habitat within the treatment area or outside of <br />the treatment area, the Compensatory Mitigation Plan would include a <br />description of the proposed habitat improvements, success criteria that <br />demonstrate the performance standard of maintained habitat function has <br />been met, legal and funding mechanisms, and parties responsible for long- <br />term management and monitoring of the restored habitat. <br />Review requirements are as follows: <br />• The project proponent would consult with CDFW and/or any other applicable <br />responsible agency prior to finalizing the Compensatory Mitigation Plan in order <br />to satisfy that responsible agency’s requirements (e.g., permits, approvals) within <br />the plan <br />• For species listed under ESA or CESA or a California Fully Protected Species, the <br />project proponent would submit the mitigation plan to CDFW and/or <br />USFWS/NOAA Fisheries for review and comment <br />• For other special-status wildlife species, the project proponent may consult with <br />CDFW and/or USFWS regarding the availability and applicability of compensatory <br />mitigation and other related technical information