RES 2026023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction November 2025 A-88 MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE? (Y/N) TIMING IMPLEMENTING ENTITY VERIFYING/ MONITORING ENTITY butterfly, such that the entirety of the habitat is not burned or removed and untreated portions of suitable habitat are retained If the project proponent cannot implement the measures above to avoid mortality, injury, or disturbance of federally listed butterflies or degradation of occupied habitat (host plants) such that its function would not be maintained, the project proponent would implement MM BIO-2c. CESA- and ESA-Listed Species. A qualified RPF or biologist would determine if, after implementation of any feasible impact avoidance measures (potentially including others not listed above), the treatment would result in mortality, injury, or disturbance, or if after implementation of the treatment, habitat function would remain for the affected species. For species listed under CESA or ESA or that are fully protected, the qualified RPF or biologist would consult with CDFW and/or USFWS regarding this determination. If consultation determines that mortality, injury, or disturbance of listed butterflies or degradation of occupied habitat such that its function would not be maintained would occur, the project proponent would implement MM BIO-2c. Other Special-Status Species. A qualified RPF or biologist with knowledge of the special- status species’ habitat and life history would review the treatment design and applicable impact minimization measures (potentially including others not listed above) to determine if the anticipated residual effects of the treatment would be significant under CEQA because implementation of the treatment would not maintain habitat function of the special-status species’ habitat or because the loss of special-status individuals would substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a special-status species. If the project proponent determines the impact on special-status butterflies would be less than significant, no further mitigation would be required. If the project proponent determines that the loss of special-status butterflies or degradation of occupied habitat would be significant under CEQA after implementing feasible treatment design alternatives and impact minimization measures, then MM BIO-2c would be implemented.