Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />4-18 <br /> <br /> <br />in order to better observe the subsurface conditions and inspect for evidence of archaeological deposits. <br />No evidence of archaeological deposits was identified as the result of the survey. <br />Consistent with CalVTP SPR CUL-2, an updated Native American contact list and sacred lands file search <br />was obtained from the NAHC. The sacred lands data file indicated no sacred sites had previously been <br />recorded within the project area or adjacent lands. On July 2, 2025, letters were sent to each of the 27 <br />Tribal contacts provided by the NAHC via email. The letters requested information regarding Tribal <br />resources and asked the Tribes to notify the City if they wished to initiate consultation regarding the <br />project actions. To date, responses have been received from the Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation, <br />Tamien Nation, Wilton Rancheria, the Ohlone Indian Tribe, and the Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe. <br />The Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation responded on July 2, 2025, and requested consultation. The <br />Tribe also requested specific information regarding proposed ground disturbance and the NWIC search <br />results and cultural resources report for the Project. The Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe responded on <br />July 23, 2025, and stated that the Tribe would like to set up a consultation meeting to further discuss the <br />Project. The Ohlone Indian Tribe responded on July 3, 2025, and requested the results of SPR CUL-2. <br />Tamien Nation responded on July 3, 2025, and stated that the Tribe will defer consultation to the <br />Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation. Wilton Rancheria responded on August 1, 2025, stating that the <br />Tribe currently has no concerns regarding the Project and requesting to be notified if there are any changes <br />or updates to the Project. As planning proceeds, the City will continue to consult with interested Tribal <br />representatives regarding the Project and incorporate their concerns into project planning and mitigation <br />as warranted. <br />4.4.1.1. Impact CUL-1 <br />The potential for vegetation treatment activities, such as manual and mechanical treatments that cause <br />ground disturbance, to cause adverse effects to historical resources (those resources evaluated as eligible <br />for listing in the CRHR) was examined in the PEIR and found to be less than significant. According to the <br />NWIC results, no historic-era built environment resources have been previously recorded within the <br />project area. Additionally, the cultural pedestrian survey conducted for the Project did not identify any <br />historic-era built cultural resources. Any impact to potential historical resources, including, but not limited <br />to, structures, buildings, or foundations, would be avoided, per SPR CUL-7, due to the lack of any proposed <br />demolition or material alteration of a structure or building or overall setting. This potential impact is within <br />the scope of the PEIR because the treatment activities and the intensity of ground disturbance that would <br />occur under the proposed project are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR. SPRs applicable to this <br />impact are CUL-1, CUL-7, and CUL-8. As described above, archaeological and historical resource record <br />searches have been conducted per SPR CUL-1. SPR CUL-7 requires the avoidance of known built historical