RES 2026023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction November 2025 4-42 • 71.040.00 Valley oak woodland and forest • 71.020.00 Blue oak woodland and forest • 61.130.24 Populus fremontii—Salix (laevigata, lasiolepis, lucida ssp. lasiandra) • 32.060.00 Coyote brush scrub • 32.060.21 Baccharis pilularis/(Nassella pulchra—Elymus glaucus—Bromus carinatus) • 32.010.11 Artemisia californica—Diplacus aurantiacus • 37.940.00 Poison oak scrub • 37.940.02 Toxicodendron diversilobum—Artemisia californica/Leymus condensatus • 43.200.00 California poppy—lupine fields • 43.200.02 Lupinus bicolor • 41.080.02 Leymus triticoides—Bromus spp.—Avena spp. • 41.080.04 Leymus triticoides—Carduus pycnocephalus—Geranium dissectum • 41.151.00 Needle grass—melic grass grassland • 41.150.01 Nassella pulchra—Lolium perenne—(Trifolium spp.) • 41.150.05 Nassella pulchra—Avena spp.—Bromus spp. Initial vegetation treatments and maintenance treatments could result in direct or indirect adverse impacts on sensitive habitats, including designated sensitive natural communities. Direct impacts on sensitive habitats include direct loss or degradation of habitat quantity or quality through vegetation removal. Indirect impacts include inadvertent introduction of invasive plant species or pathogens that would result in a habitat loss and degradation and disturbance of the ecosystem through loss of species community members (flora or fauna) through repeated presence of human activities. The potential for adverse effects to riparian or sensitive natural communities is within the scope of the activities and impacts addressed in the PEIR because the treatment activities and intensity of disturbance resulting from implementing treatment activities are consistent with those analyzed in the PEIR. Impacts to special-status wildlife would be reduced to less than significant with the following SPRs and MMs: • SPR AD-2: Delineate Protected Resources for Avoidance • SPR AD-3: Consistency with Local Plans, Policies, and Ordinances • SPR AD-5: Maintain Site Cleanliness • SPR BIO-1: Review and Survey Project-Specific Biological Resources and Determine whether Avoidance Is Possible • SPR BIO-2: Require Biological Resource Training for Workers • SPR BIO -3: Survey Sensitive Natural Communities and Other Sensitive Habitats and Map Locations o Scrub habitat in the project footprint is suitable Alameda whipsnake habitat, and work would be restricted to hand tools only o The following techniques would be implemented during treatment:  Vegetation removal would occur in irregular, oblong shapes to maintain a natural condition  Vegetation removal would avoid rocky outcroppings  The overall dominant habitat type would not be converted  Vegetation removal would focus on dead, woody materials, and invasive plants