My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026023
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 9:30:47 AM
Creation date
4/28/2026 9:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO NO. 2026-023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc. <br />CalVTP Project-Specific Analysis and Addendum <br />Augustin Bernal Community Park Fuel Reduction <br />November 2025 <br />4-51 <br /> <br /> <br />4.6.1.1. Impact GEO-1 <br />The proposed project would include prescribed burning, manual and mechanical treatments, prescribed <br />herbivory, and applied herbicide, as well as biomass disposal. These activities would create soil <br />disturbance and vegetation removal, which have the potential to create erosion and the loss of topsoil. <br />The potential impacts fall within the scope of the PEIR because the proposed work activities are similar to <br />those analyzed in the PEIR. <br />The PEIR identified the potential for project treatments to cause a substantial erosion or loss of topsoil as <br />less than significant. Implementation of SPRs AD-3, GEO-1 through GEO-8, HYD-3, HYD-4, AQ-3, and AQ-4 <br />would further minimize the risk of soil disturbance and the removal of topsoil caused by project <br />treatments. SPR GEO-1 would require that soil-disturbing activities be put on hold during precipitation; <br />SPR GEO-2 would limit the use of vehicles with high ground pressure that could lead to soil disturbance or <br />compaction on wet or saturated soils; SPR GEO -3 would require disturbed soil areas to be stabilized during <br />treatment activities; SPR GEO-4 would require treatment areas be inspected for correct erosion control <br />measures prior to the start of the rainy season and following the first large rain event; SPR GEO-5 would <br />require that stormwater be drained using water breaks to decrease the potential for channelized erosion <br />down linear treatment areas; SPR GEO-6 would require that the size of burn piles be minimized in order <br />to limit the spatial extent of damage done to soil; SPR GEO-7 would minimize erosion resulting from the <br />use of heavy equipment and herbivory that is prescribed on slopes; SPR-8 would require an RPF or licensed <br />geologist to evaluate treatment areas with slopes greater than 50 percent for unstable areas (areas with <br />potential for landslide) and unstable soils (soil with moderate to high erosion hazard); SPR HYD-3 would <br />require that environmentally sensitive areas be identified and excluded from all prescribed herbivory; SPR <br />HYD-4 would require the establishment of WLPZs in order to reduce erosion near streams; SPR AQ-3 would <br />require the creation of a Burn Plan and minimize the severity of soil burn to reduce the potential for runoff <br />and soil erosion; and SPR AQ-4 would require that unpaved dirt roads be wetted in order to control dust. <br />The proposed treatment area includes land that is outside of the CalVTP treatable landscape. While this <br />constitutes as a change to the geographic extent that is outlined in the PEIR, the slopes and soil <br />characteristics of the project area are equivalent within and outside the treatable landscape. However, <br />SPRs would be implemented as described above, which would limit the potential for erosion to occur. For <br />that reason, the potential impact related to soil erosion is also the same, as described above. This <br />determination is therefore consistent with the PEIR and would not constitute a substantially more severe <br />significant impact than what was covered in the PEIR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.