Laserfiche WebLink
notice to the applicant, the requesting party or appellant, and persons entitled to <br /> notice; and (2) publish notice in at least one newspaper of general circulation within <br /> the City or post notice in at least three public places in the City including one public <br /> place in the area directly affected by the proceeding. The public hearing notice <br /> shall include the project location, a general project description, and the date, time <br /> and location for the public hearing. Failure to mail notices shall not invalidate the <br /> proceedings. <br /> Section 10. APPROVALS; DENIALS; APPEALS <br /> (a) Initial Administrative Decision. The Zoning Administrator may approve, <br /> conditionally approve, or deny a complete and duly filed Wireless Facility Permit <br /> application administratively if no request for a hearing is timely filed, or at an <br /> administrative hearing if a timely request for a hearing is timely filed. If the Zoning <br /> Administrator refers an application for a Wireless Facility Permit to the Planning <br /> Commission, the Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve, or <br /> deny a complete and duly filed Wireless Facility Permit application at a public <br /> hearing. <br /> (b) Required Findings for Approval. The approval authority may approve wireless <br /> communication facility applications only when the approval authority makes all the <br /> following findings: <br /> (1) the proposed wireless facility is in a preferred location as defined in this policy; <br /> or the proposed wireless facility is in a discouraged location as defined in this <br /> policy and the applicant has demonstrated through a meaningful comparative <br /> analysis that no more preferred location would be technically feasible and <br /> potentially available; <br /> (2) the proposed wireless facility is on a preferred support structure as defined in <br /> this policy; or the proposed wireless facility is on a discouraged support <br /> structure as defined in this policy and the applicant has demonstrated through <br /> a meaningful comparative analysis that no more preferred support structure <br /> would be technically feasible and potentially available; <br /> (3) the proposed wireless facility complies with all applicable development <br /> standards in this policy, the Municipal Code and any other applicable <br /> regulations; <br /> (4) the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed wireless facility will comply <br /> with all applicable FCC regulations and guidelines for human exposure to RE <br /> emissions and will not, either individually or cumulatively with other transmitters <br /> in the vicinity, result in RF exposures that exceed the FCC's maximum <br /> permissible exposure level for the general population; <br /> (5) all public notices required for the application have been given; and <br /> Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Policy (City of Pleasanton) page 12/37 <br />