Laserfiche WebLink
wireless facility and the"minimum years" allowed will be measured from the date on which <br /> this policy becomes effective. <br /> Fair Market Value Minimum Years <br /> on Effective Date Allowed <br /> less than $50,000 .5 <br /> $50,000 to $500,000...... ... .10 <br /> greater than $500,000... ... ... 15 <br /> The Director may grant a written extension to a date certain when the wireless facility <br /> owner shows (i) a good faith effort to cure non-conformance; (ii) the application of this <br /> section would violate applicable laws; or(iii)extreme economic hardship would result from <br /> strict compliance with the amortization schedule. Any extension must be the minimum <br /> time period necessary to avoid such extreme economic hardship. The Director may not <br /> grant any permanent exemption from this section. <br /> Nothing in this section is intended to limit any permit term to less than 10 years for any <br /> permit granted on or after January 1, 2016. In the event that the amortization required in <br /> this section would reduce the permit term to less than 10 years for any permit granted on <br /> or after January 1, 2016, then the minimum years allowed will be automatically extended <br /> by the difference between 10 years and the number of years since the City granted such <br /> permit. Nothing in this section is intended or may be applied to prohibit any collocation or <br /> modification covered under 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a) on the basis that the subject wireless <br /> facility is a legal nonconforming wireless facility. <br /> Section 15. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR FEDERAL OR STATE PREEMPTION <br /> (a) Preface. The provisions in this Section 15 establish a procedure by which the City <br /> may grant an exception to the standards in this policy but only to the extent <br /> necessary to avoid conflict with applicable federal or state law. When the applicant <br /> requests an exception, the approval authority shall consider the findings in Section <br /> 15(b) in addition to the findings required under Section 10(b). Each exception is <br /> specific to the facts and circumstances in connection with each application. An <br /> exception granted in one instance shall not be deemed to create a presumption or <br /> expectation that an exception will be granted in any other instance. <br /> (b) Required Findings. The approval authority shall not grant any limited exception <br /> pursuant to this Section 15 unless the approval authority finds all the following: <br /> (1) the applicant has provided the approval authority with a reasonable and clearly <br /> defined technical service objective to be achieved by the proposed wireless <br /> facility; <br /> Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Policy (City of Pleasanton) page 35/37 <br />