My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP SUPPLEMENTAL 3-17-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
031726 WORKSHOP
>
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP SUPPLEMENTAL 3-17-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2026 3:43:24 PM
Creation date
4/29/2026 3:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 of 12 <br /> <br />challenges for each of them. In terms of current costs, Livermore’s recently constructed parking <br />structure cost $47 Million for an approximately 450 space structure, or over $100,000 per space <br />(this does not include the cost of land). The Downtown Parking Strategy concluded that the City <br />should focus on improved parking management strategies, before investing in a costly parking <br />structure, and this continues to be staff’s recommended approach. <br /> <br />Parking Enforcement <br />Existing parking along and adjacent to Main Street comprises both 3-hour and short-term (20 <br />minute) parking. In recent years, the City has not aggressively enforced posted time limits or <br />other violations such as vehicles occupying multiple spaces. As a result, parking spaces are often <br />occupied for longer than their allotted time (anecdotally, often by employees of local businesses), <br />leaving them unavailable for Downtown visitors. <br /> <br />Police enforcement could be stepped up, with the following considerations: <br /> <br />• Increased enforcement should be accompanied by an education/community and business <br />outreach effort beforehand to advise of pending enforcement efforts and offer information <br />on non-time restricted parking alternatives. <br /> <br />• The cost of enforcement is unlikely to be recovered by parking fines, since the municipality <br />only keeps a small proportion of fines collected, with the remainder going to other <br />agencies. <br /> <br />• For enforcement to be effective and change parking behaviors, it must be consistently <br />applied over the long term; this may suggest a need for investment in personnel (sworn or <br />non-sworn staff) equipment, such as the small parking enforcement vehicles that offer <br />more efficient patrol capabilities; or new technology to aid enforcement. <br />• <br /> <br />Parking Signage <br />Improving the visibility and public awareness of available <br />off-street parking could help alleviate pressure on Main <br />Street parking and make more efficient use of existing off <br />street public parking lots. <br /> <br />While there are already some directional parking signs <br />downtown (see photo), parking signage and wayfinding <br />could be enhanced. This includes low-cost options such as <br />installation of larger or more visible directional signage on <br />existing poles; or improved navigation tools for downtown <br />visitors (e.g. working with on-line mapping apps to ensure <br />public parking lots are identified). These strategies could be <br />deployed at minimum cost ($10,000 to $20,000) as the <br />signs can be fabricated and installed by City staff. Funding <br />has not been identified for this project. <br /> <br />More costly options would include installation of dynamic, digital message boards indicating <br />number of available spaces or partnering with parking availability app providers (e.g Park Assist,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.