Laserfiche WebLink
Submitted On:Apr 19, 2026, 02:51PM PDT <br />City Council Regular Meeting - Submit your <br />written public comment <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Full Name First Name: Todd <br />Last Name: Nelson <br />Email (this entry is disclosable if included)654tnelson@gmail.com <br />Meeting type Regular Meeting - 7 pm <br />Agenda Item Number 5 <br />Comments I support the City signing the 10-year agreement for Measure B/BB, VRF, etc. <br />I believe that the new performance metric is less about reporting efficiency and more about aligning <br />Pleasanton's improvements to the Alameda County HIN, CBN, and PSN. As a member of the ACTC <br />bike/ped advisory committee, I knew about these networks and how they differed from the City's equivalent <br />networks. BPTC was neither made aware of them nor allowed to contribute. Will these networks be <br />considered in the new Bike/Ped Master Plan or TSAP? <br />I also believe that the Strategic Plan Alignment should include "Integrity". It's a core value of the ONE <br />Pleasanton plan and refers to transparency and accountability. As stated in the "Outreach" section of the <br />agenda report, this is key, but if you search our website, you'll struggle to find the evidence (it's there, but <br />it's obscure). I've tried to understand how the City self-certifies projects for Measure B/BB. I believe there <br />is room for improvement in community engagement with respect to Measure B/BB. Staff doesn't seem to <br />want BPTC to recommend projects or help with prioritization - only to approve what Staff has already <br />decided. <br />Nonetheless, this funding source is very important, and the City should sign this agreement.