My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 5-5-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
050526 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 5-5-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2026 8:59:41 AM
Creation date
5/7/2026 2:41:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 7 <br />4. Adopt a resolution to order Proposition 218 property owner assessment ballot <br />proceedings for Bonde Ranch Landscape Maintenance District 2026-2. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, codified in Division 15, Part 2, Chapter 2, Sections <br />22500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code, authorizes local agencies to <br />impose annual assessments on real property that receives special benefit from the installation, <br />maintenance, and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements. Proposition 218, <br />codified in Article XIIID of the California Constitution, establishes procedural and substantive <br />requirements for property-related assessments, including preparation of an Engineer’s Report, <br />public notice and hearing procedures, and approval through a weighted property owner ballot <br />proceeding. <br /> <br />The City currently administers five Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs). All five were <br />formed before Proposition 218 was adopted in 1996 and are structurally underfunded. The City <br />began actively assessing rate adjustment options in 2020 and has held discussions on the <br />subject with all five districts. In 2025, the City raised the assessments for the four districts that <br />had a higher assessment rate approved when the districts were formed. Assessments <br />remained the same for Landscape Maintenance District 1993-1 (Windsor) as the approved <br />assessment rates were already consistent with the current assessment rates. <br /> <br />Landscape Maintenance Districts 1994-1 (Oak Tree Farm) and 1995-1 (Moller Ranch) include <br />an inflation factor, and their assessments were updated last year. As a result, a Proposition <br />218 ballot process is not currently expected to be necessary for those districts. The City and <br />HOA for Landscape Maintenance District 1993-1 (Windsor) are working towards a possible <br />transfer of maintenance responsibilities. The Engineer’s Reports for the Windsor, Moller <br />Ranch, and Oak Tree Farm LMDs, along with the Engineer’s Reports for the Ponderosa-Del <br />Prado and Bonde Ranch LMDs, should the votes not pass, will be presented to the City <br />Council on June 2, 2026. <br /> <br />Landscape Maintenance Districts 1984-1 (Ponderosa-Del Prado) and 1993-2 (Bonde Ranch) <br />were prioritized for the Proposition 218 vote because they face the most significant funding <br />shortfalls. Neither district includes an annual inflationary adjustment factor, assessment <br />revenues have not kept pace with rising maintenance and water costs, and neither district <br />maintains adequate reserves for capital repair and replacement needs. <br /> <br />The City conducted three rounds of neighborhood meetings for the Ponderosa-Del Prado and <br />Bonde Ranch LMDs between November 2025 and April 2026. The first meeting, held online, <br />informed residents of the districts’ financial conditions and gathered initial input. The second <br />and third meetings were held in person. At the second meeting, staff presented assessment <br />options (a high level of maintenance more consistent with the plans approved at the formation <br />of the development, a mid-level recommended by the City to reflect a sustainable maintenance <br />level based on the condition of the existing mature landscape, and a reduced maintenance <br />level, reflecting the minimum level necessary to sustainably maintain the landscape safely) and <br />notified property owners that an informal survey would be distributed to gauge support for the <br />options. At the third and final meeting, staff shared the survey results and outlined the next <br />steps. <br /> <br />Page 43 of 248
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.