Laserfiche WebLink
It is stated in Appendix H that Ponderosa Homes, in coordination with the City, is proposing to <br />install a traffic signal at the intersection of Dublin Canyon Road and Canyon Meadows Drive as <br />part of the project. I can find no discussion of this proposed traffic signal in Appendix H. Were <br />other alternatives such as stop signs or a traffic circle considered? If not, they should be considered <br />at this intersection and the justification for the traffic signal over these alternatives should be given. <br />A traffic circle would appear to be possible at this intersection. A traffic circle will slow traffic but <br />keep it moving. Stop signs are used at the Palomares Road and Dublin Canyon Road intersection <br />approximately four miles to the west. A stoplight will back up eastbound traffic and create a large <br />volume when released precluding egress from the EBRPD driveway, and other driveways to the <br />east. <br />The EBRPD driveway should be referred to as the Vinson/EBRPD driveway. I own (and pay <br />property taxes) on a substantial length (the majority) of the driveway up to the EBRPD house. <br />EBRPD has an easement over my property. Furthermore, the analysis of the traffic on the <br />Vinson/EBRPD driveway is not accurate. I have four ADUs and an additional house at the <br />terminus of the driveway on my property at the head of Devaney Canyon. EBRPD currently has <br />a fire trail crew occupying their house along the driveway. Every workday, 11 (or more) private <br />cars belonging to the trail crew drive to the EBRPD house. Added to this are the vehicles coming <br />in and out from my buildings. Of course, the EBRPD fire crew, on occasion, must to respond to <br />an emergency with their firetrucks. Finally, on occasion, there are meetings between EBRPD fire <br />crews, and Cal Fire crews. These activities are illustrated in Figures 1 to 4. This traffic volume <br />from my buildings and EBRPD fire crew activities is not accurately considered in the traffic <br />analysis. This error must be corrected and considered. The figure below from Appendix H is <br />totally incorrect: <br />The traffic flow into an out of the staging/parking area should not be combined with the <br />Vinson/EBRPD driveway. The access to the staging/parking area must be kept separate from the <br />Vinson/EBRPD driveway (but they may share the same left turn lane). The gates which will be <br />required for both driveways should be at the road. How is a truck towing a horse trailer supposed <br />T. Vinson <br />Page 2 of 28 <br />3 <br />4