My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2026039
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2026
>
RES 2026039
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2026 4:33:20 PM
Creation date
5/27/2026 4:29:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
2026-039
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Response to Public Meeting Verbal Comments <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 4-7 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec04-00 Response to Public Meeting Verbal Comments.docx <br />think that it it does pose significant impacts and to satisfy the requirements of CEQA uh this needs to <br />be resolved because uh I don't think this is an approvable EIR as it stands. Thank you. <br />Response to R.DEVANY 3 <br />Please refer to the responses to R. DEVANY 1 and R. DEVANY 2 in Section 3, Responses to Written <br />Comments, in this document. These letters discuss access to the parcel (APN 941-2600-1-3) adjacent <br />to the project site, along with impacts related to parcel access and grazing. Further, as stated by the <br />project applicant, access would be maintained for APN 941-2600-1-3 and development of the <br />proposed project would still allow for grazing uses on the project site and adjacent parcel. This <br />comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision makers for <br />review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to <br />the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further <br />response is required <br />Guy Houston (HOUSTON) <br />Mr. Chair, members of the commission, Guy Houston, 7885 and 7815 Canyon Meadow. Um, I'm a a <br />newcomer in the Canyon Meadow community. Um, before that I was actually work very closely with <br />the uh Greek Orthodox Church on their project which will be coming in the future. Um, I am here to <br />say that I think this is environmentally this is a home run for the city of Pleasanton. You've got a lot <br />of open space that's going to be set aside. You have a regional working with East Bay Regional Parks. <br />You have a regional recreation facility. Uh, and the the part of this that has been spoken by some of <br />the others from Canyon Meadow. Uh, the big one for me is the traffic improvements um on on uh <br />Dublin Canyon Road. Uh it is dangerous. It's been dangerous. I've been around long enough where <br />there's been accidents out there uh and there's a lot more close calls uh than we'd like care to think <br />about. Uh but uh this is a great improvement and from what I understand there is no money in the <br />city of Pleasanton uh for these improvements, particularly for the stoplight. So it's a huge benefit <br />and win for the city of Pleasanton in in all three of those areas. Uh, and I, you know, certainly very <br />interested in this process and going forward and to see this to completion. I might also add that, um, <br />people in the preserve, I've been around long enough to know that, uh, people said the same things <br />about them back when those houses were built. Um, and so, uh, this is just part of the process. Uh, <br />but this is a huge win for the city of Pleasanton and the citizens. Um, and staff's done a great job up <br />to this point in time. It's just taken too long. 12 years. We got to get this done. and I appreciate your <br />time. <br />Response to HOUSTON <br />This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision makers <br />for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect <br />to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no <br />further response is required. <br />Diane Lester Kolb (L.KOLB) <br />Hi, I'm Diane Lester Kolb. Uh my family's been out there for at least uh 73 years. I was I got there at a <br />year of age one year. Um, this project to me means a lot to my family. My mother has passed, so she <br />has not been able to see the finish of it. Um, everything that we have working with Ponderosa with <br />the park district, the open space, keeping the wildlife there, the signal for our our neighbors to be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.