Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Errata <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 5-15 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec05-00 Errata.docx <br />3.3–Biological Resources <br />3.3-25 and 3.3-26 <br />Clustering and siting of the proposed project allows for the in-perpetuity preservation of <br />approximately 104.63.5 acres of open space outside of the grading envelope, the majority of which <br />is contiguous with other open space lands to the north, south, and west. <br />3.3-34 <br />xx Pipes will be capped and trenches will contain exit ramps to avoid direct mortality while <br />construction areas are is active. <br /> <br />3.4–Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources <br />3.4-28 <br />Implementation of MM CUL-2 and COA CUL-3. <br />3.4–Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources <br />3.4-29 <br />Implementation of MM CUL-2 and COA CUL-3. <br />3.4–Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources <br />3.4-30 <br />For the reasons noted above, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable <br />contribution to the less than significant cumulative impact on any known archaeological resources, <br />and potentially significant impacts to any previously unknown resources that could be damaged or <br />destroyed during project construction would be mitigated to less than significant by adherence to <br />applicable laws and regulations and compliance with the identified mitigation measures and <br />condition of approval (MM CUL-2 and COA CUL-3), which requires “on-call” monitoring during <br />ground-disturbing construction, and inadvertent discovery procedures. <br />3.6–Geology, Soils, and Seismicity <br />3.4-33 <br />Thus, implementation of MM GEO-26a through GEO-26d would include the provisions required for <br />the protection and recovery of paleontological resources. As such, with the implementation of MM <br />GEO-26a through GEO-26d, impacts related to damaging unique paleontological resources would be <br />reduced to less than significant. <br />3.6–Geology, Soils, and Seismicity <br />3.6-33 and 3.6-34 <br />MM GEO-26a Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent/developer shall <br />demonstrate the retention of the services of a qualified professional Paleontologist <br />as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP). The qualified <br />Paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation