RES 2026039 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 11 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/FOF/21480016 Pleasanton Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project FOF.docx Impact HAZ-4: The proposed project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.8-20 to 3.8-21). Impact HAZ-5: For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working the project area. The City finds that there would be no impact. (Draft EIR, p. 3.8-21). Impact HAZ-6: The proposed project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.8-21 to 3.8-22). Impact HAZ-7: The proposed project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.8-22 to 3.8-23). Cumulative Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts: The City finds that the proposed project would have less than significant cumulative impacts with respect to hazards and hazardous materials. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.8-23 to 3.8-26). Impact LAND-1: The proposed project would not physically divide an established community. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, p. 3.10-10). Impact LAND-2: The proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.10-11 to 3.10-12). Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impacts: The City finds that the proposed project would have less than significant cumulative impacts with respect to land use and planning. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.10-12 to 3.10-13). Impact PUB-1: The proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.12-13 to 3.12-14). Impact PUB-2: The proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other