CITY COUNCIL REGULA MEETING AGENDA PACKET _Revised_ 6-2-26

City of Pleasanton LighƟng & Landscape Maintenance District No. 1995-1, Moller Ranch Engineer’s Report Page 27 In other words, the landscaping Improvements maintained by the proposed Assessments specially benefit the properƟes within the Maintenance District, but other nearby improvements primarily benefit other proximate proper Ɵes. Nonetheless, there are certain properƟes that are outside the boundaries of the Maintenance District that may benefit from the landscape improvements. A total of no more than 10 proximate parcels have been idenƟfied that receive some special benefit from the improvements including improved views, proximity and/or access, but do not receive extension of outdoor areas nor the special benefit of parcel creaƟon. Since these adjacent properƟes only receive a 3 of the 5 major special benefits, a 60% factor is applied. Total General Benefit to ProperƟes Outside of the District = 5.4%: Although it can reasonably be argued that Improvements inside, but near the Maintenance District boundaries are offset by similar landscape improvements provided outside, we use the more generous approach of finding that 5.4% of the Improvements may be of benefit to property outside of the Maintenance District. Benefit to Property Inside the District that is Indirect and Derivative = 0% The “indirect and derivaƟve” benefit to property within the Maintenance District is parƟcularly difficult to calculate. A solid argument can be presented that all benefit within the Maintenance District is special, because the Improvements are clearly “over and above” and “parƟcular and disƟnct” when compared with the unique proximity, access and views of the Improvements enjoyed by benefiƟng properƟes in the Maintenance District. AssumpƟons: 10 parcels outside and adjacent to the District 101 parcels in the Maintenance District CalculaƟon General Benefit to Property outside the Improvement District = Page 274 of 617