Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br />Item #8 <br /> CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> <br />June 16, 2026 <br />Finance <br /> <br />TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 <br />APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br />Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, the City is required to annually adopt its <br />appropriations limit (Limit), also known as the spending limit, for the coming fiscal year (FY <br />2026/27) for those appropriations that are funded primarily from tax revenues. The Limit is <br />adjusted each year pursuant to Proposition 111 based on both an inflation factor and <br />population changes. For FY 2026/27, the Limit was calculated based on the percentage <br />change in the county’s population and the percentage change in Pleasanton’s local <br />assessment roll due to non-residential construction provided by the Alameda County <br />Assessor’s Office. The Limit for FY 2026/27 is $946,881,705. The City’s FY 2026/27 budget <br />appropriations subject to the Limit total $131,570,300, such that the City will not exceed its <br />Limit for FY 2026/27. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Adopt a resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Appropriations Limit. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />In 1979, the voters passed Proposition 4 (Prop 4) with the intent of limiting government <br />spending. Prop 4 accomplishes this by limiting an agency's ability to keep and spend its tax <br />revenue based on its base year FY 1978/79 spending, adjusted annually by an inflation factor <br />and the agency's increase in population. Due to some difficulties with the restrictions of Prop 4, <br />revisions to the adjustment formulas were made through Proposition 111, which was adopted <br />by voters in June 1990. Proposition 111 also established FY 1986/87 as the new base year. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />The factors used to compute the Prop 4 limits are: (1) either the percentage change in <br />California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll <br />from the preceding year due to the addition of local non-residential construction in the city, and <br />(2) either the city's own population growth or the population growth of the entire county. The <br />State Department of Finance annually provides the California per capita personal income <br />change percentage for purposes of calculating the Prop 4 Spending Limit. For FY 2026/27, <br />California's per capita personal income increased by 4.95 percent, which is less than the 5.37 <br />percent increase in the City’s local assessment roll due to non-residential construction <br />provided by the Alameda County Assessor’s Office. The City’s population decrease was 0.67 <br />percent while Alameda County's population decrease was 0.10 percent; therefore, the <br />calculation for the FY 2026/27 Limit is based on the percentage change in the City’s <br />assessment roll due to non-residential construction provided by the Alameda County <br />Assessor’s Office and the county’s population decrease. Attachment 2 details the calculation of <br />the Limit for FY 2026/27 of $946,881,705. <br />Page 135 of 443