My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGLAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 6-16-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
061626 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGLAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 6-16-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2026 4:49:11 PM
Creation date
6/9/2026 4:46:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kier + Wright | Page 17 <br />Radius Design will identify dry utility and overhead power <br />PMRI GSRDZMGXW JSV IEGL EPXIVREXMZI 5,* VIPSGEXMSRW <br />are known to carry multi-year lead times, and early <br />GSRDZMGX MHIRXMǰGEXMSR MW IWWIRXMEP XS OIITMRK YXMPMX] <br />VIPSGEXMSRSǯXLITVSNIGXưWGVMXMGEPTEXL7EHMYW)IWMKR <br />will also identify backbone dry utility infrastructure to <br />be accommodated within the right-of-way for future <br />development. <br />&7;[MPPMHIRXMJ]EǯIGXIHTEVGIPWGLEVEGXIVM^IXLI <br />type of right away takes required, assess valuation <br />implications, and provide a planning-level acquisition <br />assessment addressing permanent acquisitions, <br />XIQTSVEV] IEWIQIRXW ERH TEVGIP EGGIWW IǯIGXW <br />across the corridor. <br />Deliverables: Utility, drainage, and right-of-way exhibit <br />MHIRXMJ]MRKOI]GSRDZMGXWGSRWXVEMRXWERHVMKLXSJ[E] <br />needs for each alignment alternative, accompanied <br />F] E QIQSVERHYQ WYQQEVM^MRK ǰRHMRKW ERH <br />recommendations. <br />TASK 9 - STAKEHOLDER AND AGENCY <br />COORDINATION <br />1*&)+.720; <br />CONTRIBUTING: ALL SUBCONSULTANTS <br />K+W will lead stakeholder and agency coordination <br />as directed by the City, preparing meeting materials <br />and documenting comments and responses at each <br />WXIT ;LIVI WTIGMǰG XIGLRMGEP I\TIVXMWI MW RIIHIH <br />to support a particular stakeholder conversation, the <br />relevant subconsultant will be brought in as needed. <br />The El Charro corridor involves an unusually broad <br />set of stakeholders. Key parties anticipated to require <br />coordination include quarry operators regarding <br />EGGIWWERHXVYGOXVEDzG >SRI;EXIV&KIRG]VIKEVHMRK <br />infrastructure, lake management, and groundwater <br />aquifer protection; the City of Livermore as an adjacent <br />jurisdiction; the City of Dublin given proximity and <br />TSXIRXMEP XVEDzG MQTPMGEXMSRW XLI 1MZIVQSVI &QEHSV <br />Valley Transit Authority regarding BRT considerations; <br />*EWX'E]7IKMSREP5EVO)MWXVMGXKMZIRXLILEHS[(PMǯW <br />connection at Stanley Boulevard; Caltrans depending <br />SRWXYH]EVIEPMQMXW 9RMSR5EGMǰG7EMPVSEHVIKEVHMRK <br />the crossing; and private landowners with active <br />entitlements or development applications where <br />EPMKRQIRX HIGMWMSRW GSYPH EǯIGX EGGIWW SV VMKLXSJ <br />way. Immediate neighborhood outreach is anticipated <br />to be addressed through the City of Pleasanton’s <br />existing public engagement processes. <br />Deliverables: Meeting materials, action item and <br />decision logs, and agency and stakeholder coordination <br />documentation. A minimum of three one-hour <br />meetings with each key stakeholder is anticipated, with <br />the appropriate subconsultant participating as needed <br />based on the subject matter of each meeting. <br />TASK 10 - PREFERRED ALIGNMENT <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FINAL <br />DOCUMENTATION <br />1*&)+.720; <br />CONTRIBUTING: TJKM, GREEN DESIGN, AR/WS <br />K+W will recommend a preferred precise roadway <br />alignment based on the results of the alternatives <br />EREP]WMW ERH (MX] JIIHFEGO W]RXLIWM^MRK XLI [SVO <br />products from Tasks 1 through 9. K+W, in conjunction <br />with TJKM and Green Design, will prepare draft <br />ERH ǰREP XIGLRMGEP HSGYQIRXEXMSR I\LMFMXW X]TMGEP <br />sections, and presentation materials for city review. <br />The documentation will include a clear and technically <br />defensible narrative that explains why the preferred <br />alignment is recommended and what the city should <br />expect in the next phase of project delivery. <br />Upon selection of the preferred alignment, K+W will <br />prepare a plat map and legal description of the area to <br />be reserved for the future roadway, as well as separate <br />TPEX QETW ERH PIKEP HIWGVMTXMSRW JSV IEGL EǯIGXIH <br />parcel through which the alignment extends, suitable <br />for recordation against the property as required by <br />XLI7+5&7;[MPPWYTTSVXXLMWIǯSVXF]GSRǰVQMRK <br />parcel ownership, boundary conditions, and any title <br />considerations relevant to the legal descriptions. <br />Deliverables )VEJX ERH ǰREP TVIJIVVIH EPMKRQIRX <br />TEGOEKIMRGPYHMRKGSRGITXYEPTPERERHTVSǰPIHVE[MRKW <br />typical sections with conceptual landscape treatments, <br />design assumptions and constraints summary, order- <br />of-magnitude cost estimates, and recommended next <br />WXITW ǰREPTVIGMWIVSEH[E]EPMKRQIRXVITSVX TPEXQETW <br />and legal descriptions for the preferred alignment <br />GSVVMHSV ERH IEGL EǯIGXIH TEVGIP ERH TVIWIRXEXMSR <br />QEXIVMEPWERHIHMXEFPIIPIGXVSRMGǰPIWJSV(MX]VIZMI[ <br />Page 73 of 443
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.