Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 13 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/FOF/21480016 Pleasanton Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project FOF.docx <br />Impact WILD-1: The proposed project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency <br />response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The City finds that impacts would be less than <br />significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-11 to 3.16-12). <br />Impact WILD-2: The proposed project would not, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, <br />exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a <br />wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. The City finds that impacts would be less than <br />significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-12 to 3.16-13). <br />Impact WILD-3: The proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of <br />associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other <br />utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the <br />environment. The City finds that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-13 to <br />3.16-14). <br />Cumulative Wildfire Impacts: The City finds that the proposed project would have less than <br />significant cumulative impacts with respect to wildfire. The City finds that impacts would be less <br />than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.16-15 to 3.16-16). <br />1.6 - Potential Environmental Effects Which Can Be Mitigated Below a Level <br />of Significance <br />The City of Pleasanton hereby finds that feasible mitigation measures have been identified in the EIR <br />that will avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts <br />discussed below to a less than significant level. The potentially significant impacts, and the <br />mitigation measures that will reduce them to a less than significant level, are as follows: <br />1.6.1 - Impact AES-4: Daytime Glare <br />Impact AES-4: The proposed project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. <br />Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (Draft EIR, p. 3.1-16). <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project <br />which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified <br />in the EIR. (CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)). <br />Mitigation Measures <br />MM AES-4 Adhere to Design Review Process and Standards <br />As part of the design review process for the proposed project, the applicant shall <br />include the following features in its design review submittal: <br />xx Structures facing a public street or neighboring property shall use minimally <br />reflective glass, and other materials and colors used on the exterior of buildings <br />and structures shall be selected with attention to minimizing reflective glare.