My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
05-13
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 11:54:19 AM
Creation date
7/8/2026 11:49:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Thank you for your email regarding the proposed additions at 2986 Liberty Drive. <br /> <br />The project was reviewed for compliance with the Shadow Cliff Village PUD (PUD-83-16 and <br />PUD-83-16-06m), approved by Ordinance No. 1139, as well as applicable provisions of the <br />Pleasanton Municipal Code. Attached are the proposed plans and referenced ordinance. <br /> <br />With respect to the items raised in your email: <br /> <br />The proposed addition is located on the west side of the subject property. Your property is <br />located to the south. Based on the orientation shown in the plans, the addition is positioned <br />adjacent to the street and north of your property. Sunlight rises in the east and sets in the west <br />and because the addition is not located south of your property, it would not typically be <br />positioned to block primary southern sun exposure. Additionally, the proposed addition is set <br />farther north on the lot than portions of the existing two-story structure. <br /> <br />The submitted plans do not show new windows on the south elevation facing your property. As <br />such, direct overlooking toward your home from new upper-story windows is not proposed. <br /> <br />Approximately 90% or more of the homes within the subdivision are two-story residences. The <br />proposal is being evaluated for consistency with the adopted setback and development standards <br />governing the subdivision. <br />The City does not evaluate or regulate potential property value impacts as part of development <br />review. Property values are market-based and subjective. <br /> <br />If approved, the project would be subject to standard Conditions of Approval, including <br />limitations on construction hours, stormwater protection measures, dust control, and compliance <br />with applicable building and safety codes. <br /> <br />The “Architectural Approval Requirements” referenced in your email do not originate from City <br />regulations. If such requirements stem from private HOA governing documents, they are <br />administered privately. The City does not require HOA action as part of its land use process. <br />Questions regarding HOA architectural review must be directed to your HOA directly. <br /> <br />After you have reviewed the plans, and if you still wish to formally request a hearing, as part of <br />that process, the Zoning Administrator will inquire whether there has been any prior
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.