My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
05-13
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05132026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 11:54:19 AM
Creation date
7/8/2026 11:49:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Dear Ms. Amos, <br />We submit this letter as a formal objection to Application #P26-0136 for the <br />proposed two-story addition at <br />Based on the information provided, the proposed development would materially <br />and adversely affect our property and appears inconsistent with both the <br />character of the neighborhood and the governing architectural standards <br />applicable to the Project. <br />1. Impact on Light and Outlook <br />Loss of Natural Light: <br />The proposed two-story extension appears to substantially block sunlight to our <br />main living areas and garden. The scale and positioning of the addition would <br />result in overshadowing, reducing natural light that we currently enjoy. <br />Dominance and Enclosure: <br />The height and massing of the structure appear excessive relative to the existing <br />homes in the area. The extension would create a sense of dominance and <br />enclosure, producing an oppressive “tunnel effect” between properties rather than <br />maintaining the open character typical of this single-family neighborhood. <br />2. Direct Overlooking and Loss of Privacy <br />Direct Overlooking: <br />We are particularly concerned about new upper-floor windows that would directly <br />face our master bedroom and main living spaces. <br />Loss of Privacy: <br />The proximity of the extension would allow visibility into areas of our home that <br />were previously private and shielded. The proposed structure appears too close to <br />the property line and would materially impact our reasonable expectation of <br />privacy. <br />3. Character of the Area <br />This neighborhood consists of single-family homes and is not designed or <br />characterized as townhouse-style development. None of the homes in the <br />immediate vicinity have been extended in such an intrusive manner. The <br />proposed addition appears inconsistent with the established scale, spacing, and <br />architectural harmony of the area. <br />4. Impact on Property Value <br />The cumulative effects of reduced light, loss of privacy, visual dominance, and <br />change in neighborhood character may negatively affect the value and <br />marketability of our property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.