My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 7-21-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
072126 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 7-21-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2026 11:36:47 AM
Creation date
7/16/2026 11:22:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
928
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton <br />Sewer Rate Study Report <br /> <br />Water Resources Economics <br />58 <br />4. CONNECTION FEES <br />4.1 CONNECTION FEE OVERVIEW <br />New customer connections to the City’s sewer system are subject to a sewer connection fee, <br />which is necessary to ensure that existing users are not unfairly burdened by costs incurred to <br />provide capacity for new users. The overall purpose of a connection fee is to equitably recover <br />capital costs incurred by the agency to provide system capacity to new users. Sewer connection <br />fees in California are typically developed based on one of three common methodologies outlined <br />by the AWWA in its Manual of Water Supply Practices M1: Principles of Water Rates, Fees and <br />Charges, Seventh Edition. <br /> <br />The three methodologies include: <br />1. Buy-In Method: The Buy-In Method establishes connection based on the value of the <br />system’s existing capital assets and is typically most appropriate when a system’s current <br />capacity is sufficient to serve both short-term and long-term projected demands. The <br />rationale underlying the Buy-In Method is that new customers should pay to “buy-in” to <br />existing system capacity funded by past and current users. <br />2. Incremental Cost Method: The Incremental Cost Method establishes connection fees <br />based on the cost of planned capital expenditures required to expand system capacity and <br />is typically most appropriate when a system’s current capacity is already fully utilized by <br />existing users. The rationale underlying the Incremental Cost Method is that new users <br />should fund planned capital projects that are necessary to accommodate growth. <br />3. Hybrid Method: The Hybrid Method 14 establishes capacity charges based on a <br />combination of the Buy-In Method and the Incremental Cost Method. The Hybrid Method is <br />typically most appropriate when some existing capacity is available to new users, but <br />capacity expansion is still necessary to accommodate long-term demands. <br /> <br />WRE recommends the Buy-In Method for the City’s sewer connection fees as the existing system <br />has remaining capacity to serve new customers. <br /> <br />4.2 BUY-IN METHOD <br />EXISTING SYSTEM VALUE <br />The Buy-In component, shown in Table 4-1, calculates the value of the existing sewer system. The <br />existing system value (Line 3) is determined based on the value of fixed assets (Line 1) and O&M, <br />Replacement, and CIP cash balances (Line 2; from Table 2-18 and Table 2-19, sum of Line 1) as <br />of FY 2027. <br /> <br /> <br />14 The Hybrid Method is referred to by the AWWA as the “Combined Cost Approach.” <br />Page 210 of 923
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.