Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Responses to Written Comments <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3-93 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec03-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx <br />Tim Hyles (T.HYLES) <br />Response to T.HYLES-1 <br />Please see Response to M.CARREON-1. This comment is included in the administrative record and <br />will be provided to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide <br />new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts <br />evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Response to T.HYLES-2 <br />Please refer to Master Response 1, Non-CEQA Issues Not Addressed in Final EIR, in Section 2, Master <br />Responses, of this document. This Master Response provides an explanation of the scope of CEQA. <br />The Draft EIR concludes that, with the proposed roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian improvements, the <br />project would not result in a significant transportation safety impact, including for pedestrians and <br />bicyclists. CEQA does not require the project to correct existing conditions unrelated to project <br />impacts. Decisions regarding the installation of additional street lighting within the public right-way <br />may be considered by the City outside the CEQA process for this project through separate <br />considerations. Such actions would be discretionary and would not be part of this project or <br />required as mitigation for the proposed project. This comment is included in the administrative <br />record and will be provided to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The comment did <br />not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental <br />impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Response to T.HYLES-3 <br />This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision-makers <br />for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect <br />to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no <br />further response is required <br />   <br /><br /> <br /> <br />