My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-08
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2026 8:27:46 AM
Creation date
8/4/2026 8:25:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Responses to Written Comments <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3-127 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec03-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx <br />associated with additional trips to and from the EBRPD trail was evaluated in Appendix H of the Draft <br />EIR and discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.14, Transportation, pages 3.14-11 through 3.14-19. Further, <br />the proposed trail is required to be compliant with all operational EBRPD rules, with EBRPD staff <br />member enforcement as needed. This comment is included in the administrative record and will be <br />provided to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, <br />substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated <br />in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-10 <br />The proposed project was introduced before the City’s Planning Commission at the December 10, <br />2025, Planning Commission meeting. Members of the public and members of the City’s Planning <br />Commission were provided with an opportunity to comment on and discuss the proposed project. <br />Additionally, this Final EIR will be presented to the City Council for certification. Please refer to the <br />Response to T.VINSON 3 for a response to the public comment received by Ted Vinson at this <br />meeting. This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision- <br />makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with <br />respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, <br />no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-11 <br />Please refer to Master Response 1, Non-CEQA Issues Not Addressed in Final EIR, in Section 2, Master <br />Responses, of this document. This Master Response provides an explanation of the scope of CEQA. <br />Additionally, refer to the Response to T.VINSON 1-9 for a discussion of the EBRPD trail staging and <br />access. This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision- <br />makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with <br />respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, <br />no further response is required. <br />Response to T.VINSON 1-12 <br />The EBRPD is identified as a Responsible Agency under CEQA and may rely on the City’s EIR, if <br />certified, in connection with its discretionary approvals, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Sections <br />15050(b) and 15096. As described in Chapter 2, Project Description, and analyzed throughout the <br />Draft EIR, the trail EBRPD dedication and trail are elements of the proposed project and, as such the <br />Draft EIR analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the staging area, trail connection, and <br />related facilities, including impacts to biological resources, aesthetics, transportation, recreation, and <br />other relevant issue areas, and identifies mitigation measures where required. Thus, potential <br />impacts related to the dedication of open space and associated trail connection are included in the <br />analysis of the Draft EIR. No separate CEQA documentation would be required. CEQA does not <br />require separate EIRs to be prepared by each public agency involved in a project when the project is <br />evaluated in a single, comprehensive EIR by the Lead Agency. Nor does CEQA require a Responsible <br />Agency to prepare a separate Draft EIR where the environmental effects of its discretionary actions <br />are adequately addressed in the Lead Agency’s EIR. To the extent that EBRPD undertakes future, <br />discretionary actions related to the regional trail system that are independent of the proposed <br />project or that were not evaluated in this Draft EIR, those actions would be subject to their own <br />CEQA review by EBRPD at the time such actions are proposed and would be subject to all applicable <br /> <br /><br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.