My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-08
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2026 8:27:46 AM
Creation date
8/4/2026 8:25:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Response to Public Meeting Verbal Comments <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 4-7 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec04-00 Response to Public Meeting Verbal Comments.docx <br />think that it it does pose significant impacts and to satisfy the requirements of CEQA uh this needs to <br />be resolved because uh I don't think this is an approvable EIR as it stands. Thank you. <br />Response to R.DEVANY 3 <br />Please refer to the responses to R. DEVANY 1 and R. DEVANY 2 in Section 3, Responses to Written <br />Comments, in this document. These letters discuss access to the parcel (APN 941-2600-1-3) adjacent <br />to the project site, along with impacts related to parcel access and grazing. Further, as stated by the <br />project applicant, access would be maintained for APN 941-2600-1-3 and development of the <br />proposed project would still allow for grazing uses on the project site and adjacent parcel. This <br />comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision makers for <br />review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to <br />the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further <br />response is required <br />Guy Houston (HOUSTON) <br />Mr. Chair, members of the commission, Guy Houston, 7885 and 7815 Canyon Meadow. Um, I'm a a <br />newcomer in the Canyon Meadow community. Um, before that I was actually work very closely with <br />the uh Greek Orthodox Church on their project which will be coming in the future. Um, I am here to <br />say that I think this is environmentally this is a home run for the city of Pleasanton. You've got a lot <br />of open space that's going to be set aside. You have a regional working with East Bay Regional Parks. <br />You have a regional recreation facility. Uh, and the the part of this that has been spoken by some of <br />the others from Canyon Meadow. Uh, the big one for me is the traffic improvements um on on uh <br />Dublin Canyon Road. Uh it is dangerous. It's been dangerous. I've been around long enough where <br />there's been accidents out there uh and there's a lot more close calls uh than we'd like care to think <br />about. Uh but uh this is a great improvement and from what I understand there is no money in the <br />city of Pleasanton uh for these improvements, particularly for the stoplight. So it's a huge benefit <br />and win for the city of Pleasanton in in all three of those areas. Uh, and I, you know, certainly very <br />interested in this process and going forward and to see this to completion. I might also add that, um, <br />people in the preserve, I've been around long enough to know that, uh, people said the same things <br />about them back when those houses were built. Um, and so, uh, this is just part of the process. Uh, <br />but this is a huge win for the city of Pleasanton and the citizens. Um, and staff's done a great job up <br />to this point in time. It's just taken too long. 12 years. We got to get this done. and I appreciate your <br />time. <br />Response to HOUSTON <br />This comment is included in the administrative record and will be provided to the decision makers <br />for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect <br />to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no <br />further response is required. <br />Diane Lester Kolb (L.KOLB) <br />Hi, I'm Diane Lester Kolb. Uh my family's been out there for at least uh 73 years. I was I got there at a <br />year of age one year. Um, this project to me means a lot to my family. My mother has passed, so she <br />has not been able to see the finish of it. Um, everything that we have working with Ponderosa with <br />the park district, the open space, keeping the wildlife there, the signal for our our neighbors to be <br /> <br /><br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.