My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-08
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2026 8:27:46 AM
Creation date
8/4/2026 8:25:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project <br />Final EIR Response to Public Meeting Verbal Comments <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 4-9 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec04-00 Response to Public Meeting Verbal Comments.docx <br />that will not lead to the uh issues that I just pointed out. Uh beyond that, I believe that the uh East <br />Bay Regional Park/Vinson driveway because we share the driveway and in fact I've been on the <br />driveway for 70 years. They are the newcomers. Uh that that should be separate from the driveway <br />and access to the parking area. I believe the gates that are shown in the uh uh draft environmental <br />report should be moved to Dublin Canyon Road. Uh and again that those driveways be kept <br />separate. <br />Um beyond that the effect of the hydrology and the change in hydrology associated with the <br />development uh is not really clear to me. Uh, and I'm a little bit concerned about it because what <br />was done at the preserve and approved by the city, you own it now, is to dump the storm water, <br />literally dump the storm water from the preserve at two locations near Dublin Canyon Road into just <br />the old drainages. And with the result, when you pave an area, it's just basic hydrologic principles. <br />When you pave an area, you actually get a shorter uh retention and you get a higher peak in terms <br />of the flow. And at the two locations I'm referring to, it absolutely blows out the culverts in the <br />crossing there. I would say once every three or four years. I mean, Diane can support me on this. I <br />don't know why it was ever approved. And consequently, I am concerned when I read uh in the <br />report if I can find the wording but basically says that uh there's not going to be oh . . . but it says <br />that all water uh is controlled uh and does that which is just a statement. <br />And it says all water is controlled. And of course I can read the size of the of the piping and the storm <br />water system etcetera. But in a way I kind of don't believe it. The flooding on Dublin Canyon Road <br />and there's others here that can substantiate this from Canyon Meadows, Diane, and Canyon Creek. <br />The flooding is so severe on Dublin Canyon Road that that when the cars drive through it, they create <br />a rooster tail like you're out water skiing. It's unbelievable . . .Okay. Well one of the thing I would say <br />is that uh when you divert water uh you actually are controlled by the State Water Resources Control <br />Board. So, in this area after you have diverted the water I do wonder is the control board, have they <br />been notified because they're concerned about my diversion of water and therefore, I have to <br />believe they would be concerned about this diversion of water. All right. These are my points and I <br />will have a written report that I'll submit. Thank you very much. <br />Response to T.VINSON2 <br />Refer to the Response to T. VINSON 1-4 and the Response to T. VINSON 1-9 in Section 3, Responses <br />to Written Comments, in this document for a discussion of the siting and access of the proposed <br />EBRPD parking lot and trailhead. As stated by the project applicant at the Planning Commission <br />public meeting for the proposed project, an official connection to the EBRPD trail is proposed on the <br />project site which would facilitate trail connections outside of private property. Additionally, a <br />private access gate would be installed to restrict access beyond the EBRPD trailhead. <br />Please also refer to the Response to T. VINSON 1-5 and the Response to T. VINSON 1-6 in Section 3, <br />Responses to Written Comments, in this document for an explanation of hydrologic impacts related <br />to development of the proposed project. This comment is included in the administrative record and <br />will be provided to the decision makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide <br />new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts <br />evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. <br /> <br /><br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.