PC-2026-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project Final EIR Responses to Written Comments FirstCarbon Solutions 3-21 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480016 Sec03-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx Department of Toxic Substances Control 2 (DTSC 2) Response to DTSC 2-1 This comment is included in the administrative record. This comment will be provided to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. Response to DTSC 2-2 As stated in Draft EIR Section 3.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, page 3.8-3 and 3.8-4, of the Draft EIR, the project site is primarily undeveloped, is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and has no areas of concern on the project site identified by DTSC’s EnviroStor. The project site has been used as rangeland for cattle grazing since the early 1900s. This comment is noted and is included in the administrative record. The Draft EIR adequately addresses hazards and hazardous materials consistent with CEQA. DTSC’s recommendations are acknowledged and will be incorporated into project implementation, as applicable, through compliance with existing regulatory programs and site-specific investigation and mitigation, should previously unidentified contamination be discovered. The commenter’s recommendations will be provided to the Lead Agency and the project applicant for further consideration. This comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required. Response to DTSC 2-3 As noted in Draft EIR Chapter 2, Project Description, page 2-54, the proposed project would not require the off-haul or import of dirt for construction activities. The commenter’s recommendations will be provided to the Lead Agency and the project applicant for further consideration. This comment is included in the administrative record. This comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required Response to DTSC 2-4 This comment is noted and is included in the administrative record. The commenter’s recommendations will be provided to the Lead Agency and the project applicant for further consideration. This comment did not provide new, substantial evidence with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no further response is required