My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2026-15
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
PC-2026-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2026 12:52:06 PM
Creation date
8/5/2026 12:48:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GEOTECHNICAL <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />WATER RESOURCES <br />CONSTRUCTION SERVICES <br />COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS <br /> <br />2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 250 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 866-9000 info@engeo.com <br />www.engeo.com <br />Project No. <br /> 9785.004.001 <br />April 16, 2024 <br />Latest Revision October 31, 2025 <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Reilly <br />330 Land Company, LLC <br />16381 Scientific Way <br />Irvine, CA 92618 <br />Subject: Arroyo Lago <br /> Unincorporated Alameda County, California <br /> <br /> DESIGN-LEVEL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Reilly: <br /> <br />As requested, we completed this design-level geotechnical exploration for the proposed Arroyo <br />Lago development along Busch Road in Unincorporated Alameda County, adjacent to the City of <br />Pleasanton’s eastern city limits. The proposed project will include a residential community <br />comprising of 194 lots with associated paved roads, open park spaces, improvements, and <br />retaining walls. We have characterized the subsurface conditions at the site to provide the <br />enclosed geotechnical report presenting our conclusions and design-level geotechnical <br />recommendations for the proposed development at the site. <br /> <br />It is our opinion from a geotechnical engineering viewpoint, that the site is suitable for the planned <br />development provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into <br />project design and implemented during construction. The main geotechnical concerns for the <br />planned site development include areas underlain by existing undocumented fill, expansive soil, <br />and seismic shaking. <br /> <br />Our findings indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the <br />recommendations and guidelines provided in this report are implemented during project planning, <br />design, and construction. We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project and are <br />prepared to consult further with you and your design team as the project progresses. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />ENGEO Incorporated <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Justin Qiu, PE Jeanine Ruffoni, GE <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Josef J. Tootle, GE <br /> <br />jq/jtr/jjt/dt
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.