PC-2026-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

8 New City Laws are uniformly applied on a City-wide basis to all substantially similar types of development projects and properties.e. New City Laws that do not conflict with this Agreement, the Vested Approvals or the Subsequent Approvals and further provided that such New City Laws are uniformly applied on a City-wide basis to all substantially similar types of development projects and properties. Section 2.4 Moratorium, Initiatives and Conflicting Enactments. To the extent consistent with State law (and excepting a declaration of a local emergency or state emergency as defined in Government Code § 8558), if any ordinance, resolution or other measure is enacted subsequent to the Effective Date, whether by action of City, by initiative, referendum, or otherwise, that imposes a building moratorium, a limit on the rate of development, or a voter- approval requirement which would otherwise affect the timely development or implementation of the Project or Project Approvals or Subsequent Approvals for all or any part of the Project Site (“City Law”), City agrees that such City Law shall not apply to the Project, the Project Site, this Agreement, the Project Approvals, or the Subsequent Approvals, if any, during the Term. Section 2.5 Life of Project Approvals or Subsequent Approvals. The term of any other Project Approval or Subsequent Approval shall automatically be extended for the longer of the Term or the term otherwise applicable to such Project Approval or Subsequent Approval if this Agreement is no longer in effect. The term of any other Project Approval or Subsequent Approval shall not include any period of time during which any applicable development or utility moratorium, lawsuit, or the actions of other public agencies that regulate land use, delays the granting of any Subsequent Approval or the development of the Project, including, but not limited to, the period of time of any lawsuit challenging the Project Approvals and/or Subsequent Approvals. Any tentative map prepared for the Project shall comply with Government Code Section 66473.7. Section 2.6 Reliance on Addendum. An Addendum to the Project EIR was prepared for and adopted by City. The Addendum was prepared to determine whether or not the Project EIR prepared for and certified by the County of Alameda in connection with the County Proposal remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the Project being proposed in the City, which was a responsible agency for purposes of the Project EIR, or whether additional documentation is required under CEQA. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and15164, the Addendum evaluated the proposed changes and documented the basis for the conclusion that the proposed changes would not result in new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts, and further, that no new information of substantial importance has occurred. Section 2.7 Subsequent CEQA Review. In the event that any additional CEQA documentation is legally required for any discretionary Subsequent Approval for the Project, then the scope of such documentation shall be focused, to the extent possible consistent with CEQA, on the specific subject matter of the Subsequent Approval, and the City shall conduct such CEQA review in a timely manner. ARTICLE 3 Developer Obligations Section 3.1 Obligations of Developer Generally. The Parties acknowledge and agree that City’s agreement to perform and abide by the covenants and obligations of City set forth in this Agreement is a material consideration for Developer’s agreement to perform and abide by its covenants and obligations, as set forth herein.