|
Resolution No. PC-2026-17
<br />Page 2 of 4
<br />Addendum adequately described the Project, its significant environmental impacts, and
<br />mitigation measures; and
<br />WHEREAS,at its duly noticed public meeting of June 24, 2026, the Planning
<br />Commission conducted a public hearing at which it considered the agenda report, all public
<br />testimony, relevant exhibits, and staff recommendations regarding the approvals of the Project
<br />entitlements and adopted Resolution No. PC-2026-16, recommending the City Council
<br />approve the Project entitlements and approvals listed above, except for the PADA; and
<br />WHEREAS,at its duly noticed public meeting of June 24, 2026, the Planning
<br />Commission conducted a public hearing at which it considered the agenda report, all public
<br />testimony, relevant exhibits, and staff recommendations regarding the approvals of the Project
<br />entitlements and the Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement labeled as Attachment 1
<br />included hereto and made a part hereof; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PADA and found it to be
<br />consistent with the General Plan, as proposed to be amended, and that it would provide
<br />substantial public benefits, including open space preservation, transportation and infrastructure
<br />improvements; and
<br />WHEREAS,the Planning Commission conditioned its recommendation to the City
<br />Council to approve the PADA on an amendment of PADA Section 3.2.h to increase the
<br />Applicant’s contribution to the improvement of El Charro Road to its full fair share of Eight
<br />Million dollars ($8,000,000).
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
<br />Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written agenda
<br />reports and all public comments and testimony:
<br />Section 1: Adopts the recitals set forth above as if restated here in full.
<br />Section 2:Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867.5, the Planning
<br />Commission finds and recommends that the City Council, after taking action on the Project,
<br />find that the approval of the Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement, based on the terms,
<br />would provide substantial public benefits, including transportation and infrastructure
<br />improvements, and financial contributions toward public facilities, and is consistent with the
<br />General Plan, insomuch as it:
<br />a. Contains all terms required by state law, as reflected in California Government Code
<br />Section 65865.2, including the duration (a 10-year term with no extension), as well as
<br />the permitted uses of the property (single-family homes, public park, subdivision
<br />improvements, and trail extension), density (6.3 dwelling units/acre), maximum height
<br />(22’-30’) and size of proposed buildings (2,551 ft2 – 3,398 ft
<br />2), and provisions for
<br />reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, as set forth in the Project
<br />entitlement approvals described above;
<br />
<br /><br />
|