RES 2026064 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 2026-064 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, any timely written objections to the assessment received by the deadline posted in the Notice of Public Hearing have been duly considered and a written response has been provided pursuant to Government Code Sections 53759.1 and 53759.2; and WHEREAS, during the public hearing, written protests and verbal protests were received, which the City Council noted and has considered along with all other information received during the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Ponderosa-Del Prado Landscape Maintenance District 2026-1 supersedes and replaces the existing Ponderosa-Del Prado Landscape Maintenance District 1984-1, the assessments for which have been accounted for in Fund 134, and upon formation of the new District the predecessor district will be dissolved and any unexpended balance remaining in Fund 134, estimated at approximately $73,260 as of April 2026, having been collected for the special benefit of the same parcels, will remain available to fund the Improvements within the same area. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. The canvass of the assessment ballots submitted by property owners is complete and certified by the City Clerk, and the votes cast are as follows: Ballot Category Number of Weighted Assessment Weighted Ballots Amount Percentage Valid Ballots 174 $42,562.98 100% Processed Yes Votes 94 $22,990.90 54.02% No Votes 80 $19,572.08 45.98% Invalid Ballots 0 $0.00 N/A SECTION 3. 174 assessment ballots were returned and received prior to the close of the public hearing on July 27, 2026. This represents a 50.58% ballot return rate on the 344 ballots. Of the assessment ballots returned, 0 assessment ballots were declared invalid, in that they were either not marked with a "Yes" or"No", were marked with both a "Yes" and a"No", were not signed, or the property ownership and barcode information was illegible. SECTION 4. As determined by ballots cast, on an unweighted basis, 54.02% of the property owners cast ballots in support of the measure. As determined by ballots cast, as weighted according to the amount of assessment for each parcel, 54.02% of the property owners cast ballots in support of the District. Since a majority protest, as defined by Article XIIID of the California Constitution, did not exist, the City Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order the